Use of OCT in Calcified Lesions: Results from a Subanalysis of ILUMIEN IV

Coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as it is associated with suboptimal stent expansion, higher complication rates, and an increased risk of long-term adverse events. Intracoronary imaging, particularly optical coherence tomography (OCT), enables accurate calcium quantification, facilitates adequate lesion preparation, and optimizes stent implantation.

In this prespecified subanalysis of ILUMIEN IV, the impact of OCT guidance versus conventional angiography was assessed in patients with moderately or severely calcified coronary lesions.

A total of 1,082 patients from the main trial with single treated lesions and moderate/severe calcification confirmed by a core lab were included. The OCT-guided strategy was compared with angiography guidance, with the primary clinical endpoint (PCE) being target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years —a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. The primary imaging endpoint was post-PCI minimum stent area (MSA).

OCT-guided PCI was associated with a larger post-procedure MSA (5.57 ± 1.86 vs. 5.33 ± 1.78 mm²; p=0.03) and better stent expansion. It also showed lower rates of edge dissection, significant malapposition, and focal residual disease in reference segments.

Read also: Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Positive Coronary CT Angiography: Implications of Invasive Physiological Studies.

Clinically, the OCT-guided strategy significantly reduced 2-year events: lower TVF (6.8% vs. 9.7%; adjHR 0.62; 95%CI: 0.40–0.96; p=0.03), fewer serious MACE (2.8% vs. 4.7%; adjHR 0.49; p=0.03), reduced target vessel myocardial infarction (1.9% vs. 4.0%; adjHR 0.36; p=0.01), and fewer stent thromboses (0.2% vs. 1.5%; adjHR 0.11; p=0.04). A significant reduction in serious adverse events at 30 days was also observed.

Conclusions

In patients with angiographically relevant coronary calcification, OCT-guided PCI demonstrated sustained 2-year clinical benefits, attributable to better lesion preparation and stent optimization. These findings support the use of OCT in this complex patient subgroup.

Original Title: Optical coherence tomography- vs angiography-guided coronary stent implantation in calcified lesions: the ILUMIEN IV trial.

Reference: Ali ZA, Shin D, Vijayvergiya R, Gawalkar AA, Shlofmitz RA, Alfonso F, Calligaris G, Canova P, Sakai K, Price MJ, Leistner D, Prati F, Mintz G, Matsumura M, McGreevy RJ, McNutt RW, Nie H, Buccola J, Landmesser U, Maehara A, Stone GW. Optical coherence tomography- vs angiography-guided coronary stent implantation in calcified lesions: the ILUMIEN IV trial. Eur Heart J. 2025 Aug 21;46(32):3201-3210. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf331. PMID: 40470719; PMCID: PMC12369818.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

High Ischaemic Risk Criteria in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Prognosis

Despite advances in the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), including the widespread use of drug-eluting stents (DES) and the optimization of medical therapy,...

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. In this context, the IVUS-CHIP trial was designed to evaluate...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Mechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulation in intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis

Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) has anticoagulation as the standard treatment, while reperfusion strategies remain a matter of debate. In this context, mechanical thrombectomy has...

High Ischaemic Risk Criteria in Chronic Coronary Syndrome: Prevalence and Prognosis

Despite advances in the management of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS), including the widespread use of drug-eluting stents (DES) and the optimization of medical therapy,...

Management of Valve Thrombosis in TAVI: Current Evidence-Based Approach

The expansion of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) into younger and lower-risk populations has brought bioprosthetic valve thrombosis to the forefront as a clinically...