Use of OCT in Calcified Lesions: Results from a Subanalysis of ILUMIEN IV

Coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), as it is associated with suboptimal stent expansion, higher complication rates, and an increased risk of long-term adverse events. Intracoronary imaging, particularly optical coherence tomography (OCT), enables accurate calcium quantification, facilitates adequate lesion preparation, and optimizes stent implantation.

In this prespecified subanalysis of ILUMIEN IV, the impact of OCT guidance versus conventional angiography was assessed in patients with moderately or severely calcified coronary lesions.

A total of 1,082 patients from the main trial with single treated lesions and moderate/severe calcification confirmed by a core lab were included. The OCT-guided strategy was compared with angiography guidance, with the primary clinical endpoint (PCE) being target vessel failure (TVF) at 2 years —a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. The primary imaging endpoint was post-PCI minimum stent area (MSA).

OCT-guided PCI was associated with a larger post-procedure MSA (5.57 ± 1.86 vs. 5.33 ± 1.78 mm²; p=0.03) and better stent expansion. It also showed lower rates of edge dissection, significant malapposition, and focal residual disease in reference segments.

Read also: Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Positive Coronary CT Angiography: Implications of Invasive Physiological Studies.

Clinically, the OCT-guided strategy significantly reduced 2-year events: lower TVF (6.8% vs. 9.7%; adjHR 0.62; 95%CI: 0.40–0.96; p=0.03), fewer serious MACE (2.8% vs. 4.7%; adjHR 0.49; p=0.03), reduced target vessel myocardial infarction (1.9% vs. 4.0%; adjHR 0.36; p=0.01), and fewer stent thromboses (0.2% vs. 1.5%; adjHR 0.11; p=0.04). A significant reduction in serious adverse events at 30 days was also observed.

Conclusions

In patients with angiographically relevant coronary calcification, OCT-guided PCI demonstrated sustained 2-year clinical benefits, attributable to better lesion preparation and stent optimization. These findings support the use of OCT in this complex patient subgroup.

Original Title: Optical coherence tomography- vs angiography-guided coronary stent implantation in calcified lesions: the ILUMIEN IV trial.

Reference: Ali ZA, Shin D, Vijayvergiya R, Gawalkar AA, Shlofmitz RA, Alfonso F, Calligaris G, Canova P, Sakai K, Price MJ, Leistner D, Prati F, Mintz G, Matsumura M, McGreevy RJ, McNutt RW, Nie H, Buccola J, Landmesser U, Maehara A, Stone GW. Optical coherence tomography- vs angiography-guided coronary stent implantation in calcified lesions: the ILUMIEN IV trial. Eur Heart J. 2025 Aug 21;46(32):3201-3210. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf331. PMID: 40470719; PMCID: PMC12369818.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...