Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

In Hospital Complications after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Bicuspid vs. Tricuspid Aortic Valves: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. 

Bicuspid aortic valves (BAV), present in 0,5 to 2% of the population, represent a technical challenge in TAVR given the asymmetric nature of leaflets and frequent dilation of the ascending aorta, factors that might lead to different outcomes vs tricuspid aortic valves (TAV). This study sought to assess and compare in-hospital complications following TAVR in BAV vs TAV patients, in addition to identifying the associated risk factors. 

The primary outcome was in-hospital complications: acute kidney failure (AKI), need for prmanent pacemaker implantation (PPM), paravalvular leak and device success, according to VARC-3 criteria. The secondary end point was identifying clinical and biochemical predictors of each of the complications. 

The study retrospectively looked at 1154 patients undergoing TAVR at the West China Hospital between 2010 and 2022: 508 with BAV and 646 with TAV. Mean patient age was 71.9, and they were predominantly men (60%).

BAV patients were younger (70.3 vs. 72.1; p<0.001), presented lower proportion of NYHA III–IV (81.7% vs. 92.6%; p<0.001) and lower prevalence of hypertension (41.9% vs. 58.7%; p<0.001), though with higher prevalence of diabetes (20.9% vs. 15.3%; p=0.018). The study did not report on the proportion of self-expanding vs. balloon expandable valves. 

Read also: Use of Distal Radial Access for Recanalization of Radial Occlusions.

There were 40 AKI cases (11 with BAV and 29 with TAV; OR 0.52; CI95% 0.23–1.09), 134 PPM implantations (67 in each group; OR 1.29; CI95% 0.87–1.92), 129 paravalvular leaks (43 with BAV and 86 with TAV; OR 1.29; CI95% 0.82–2.02) and 1105 device success cases (492 with BAV and 613 with TAV; OR 1.65; CI95% 0.86–3.29). After adjusting for multivariables, no complication showed statistically significant differences according to valve type. 

Additional analysis identified elevated total bilirubin and hypoalbuminemia were associated to higher risk of AKI; age, albumin and NYHA class were associated with need for PPM; platelet count with the occurrence of paravalvular leak; and leucocyte count with lower probability of device success. 

Conclusion

In this retrospective cohort with over 1100 patients, in-hospital complications rate after TAVR did not differ significantly between BAV and TAV patients. 

Original Title: Comparison of in-Hospital Complication Rates After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valves: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Reference: Tingxi Zhu, et al. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2025; 1–9.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...