TCT 2025 | SELUTION4ISR: sirolimus-eluting balloon for in-stent restenosis

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to be a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary PCI practice. In the DES era, its incidence reaches 4–8% during the first year and persists at around 1% annually, accounting for over 10% of current PCI procedures. Although repeat DES implantation remains the guideline-recommended strategy (Class IA), layering multiple metallic components may compromise coronary flow and increase long-term event risk.

The SELUTION4ISR study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a sirolimus-eluting balloon (SELUTION SLR DEB) compared with standard treatment, consisting predominantly of DES re-implantation (~80%) and to a lesser extent plain balloon angioplasty (~20%).

This was a randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority trial including 418 patients with ISR in a single native coronary vessel previously treated with BMS or DES, with lesion length ≤26 mm and reference diameter 2.0–4.5 mm. Lesions with more than two stent layers, complex bifurcations, total occlusions, or visible thrombus were excluded.

The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, vessel-related MI, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization.

Read also: TCT 2025 | SELUTION DeNovo: sirolimus-eluting balloon vs. stent in de novo coronary lesions.

At 1-year follow-up, TLF occurred in 15.2% with SELUTION DEB vs. 13.5% with standard treatment, achieving non-inferiority (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.69–1.90; p=0.608). There were no significant differences in individual components: cardiac mortality (1.9% vs. 1.4%), target-vessel MI (7.1% vs. 4.8%), or target-vessel revascularization (11.9% vs. 11.5%). Safety event rates were also comparable.

Conclusion

SELUTION becomes the first sirolimus-eluting balloon to demonstrate non-inferiority versus current standard practice for ISR treatment, providing an effective alternative that avoids additional metal layers.

Presented by Donald E. Cutlip at TCT 2025 Late-Breaking Clinical Trials, October 26, San Francisco, USA.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...

ACC 2026 | CHIP-BCIS3: Impella use as support in high-risk complex PCI

The use of percutaneous ventricular support during high-risk complex PCI has been proposed as a strategy to prevent hemodynamic deterioration in patients with severe...

ACC 2026 | ORBITA-CTO: PCI in chronic total occlusions and stable angina — the randomized trial we were missing?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total occlusions (CTO) remains a topic of ongoing debate in stable angina, with persistent uncertainty regarding its role...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | Protect The Head-To-Head Trial: Randomized Comparison Between Emboliner and Sentinel During TAVI

Ischemic stroke remains one of the most feared complications of TAVI, with a relatively low but persistent incidence of 2–4%, without significant reduction over...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...