TCT 2025 | SELUTION4ISR: sirolimus-eluting balloon for in-stent restenosis

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to be a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary PCI practice. In the DES era, its incidence reaches 4–8% during the first year and persists at around 1% annually, accounting for over 10% of current PCI procedures. Although repeat DES implantation remains the guideline-recommended strategy (Class IA), layering multiple metallic components may compromise coronary flow and increase long-term event risk.

The SELUTION4ISR study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a sirolimus-eluting balloon (SELUTION SLR DEB) compared with standard treatment, consisting predominantly of DES re-implantation (~80%) and to a lesser extent plain balloon angioplasty (~20%).

This was a randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority trial including 418 patients with ISR in a single native coronary vessel previously treated with BMS or DES, with lesion length ≤26 mm and reference diameter 2.0–4.5 mm. Lesions with more than two stent layers, complex bifurcations, total occlusions, or visible thrombus were excluded.

The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, vessel-related MI, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization.

Read also: TCT 2025 | SELUTION DeNovo: sirolimus-eluting balloon vs. stent in de novo coronary lesions.

At 1-year follow-up, TLF occurred in 15.2% with SELUTION DEB vs. 13.5% with standard treatment, achieving non-inferiority (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.69–1.90; p=0.608). There were no significant differences in individual components: cardiac mortality (1.9% vs. 1.4%), target-vessel MI (7.1% vs. 4.8%), or target-vessel revascularization (11.9% vs. 11.5%). Safety event rates were also comparable.

Conclusion

SELUTION becomes the first sirolimus-eluting balloon to demonstrate non-inferiority versus current standard practice for ISR treatment, providing an effective alternative that avoids additional metal layers.

Presented by Donald E. Cutlip at TCT 2025 Late-Breaking Clinical Trials, October 26, San Francisco, USA.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...

Perforation Management in Bifurcations: Bench Testing of Bailout with Covered Stents

Coronary perforations during PCI are one of the most dreaded complications in interventional cardiology, especially in bifurcations. Though rate, this critical situation requires an...

EMERALD II: Non-Invasive Coronary Anatomy and Physiology (CCTA) in ACS Prediction

Despite steady progress in secondary prevention and medical treatment optimization (OMT), acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbimortality....

Left or Right Transradial Approach? Comparing Radiation Exposure in Coronary Procedures

Radiation exposure during percutaneous procedures is a problem both for patients and operators. The transradial is currently the preferred approach, vs. femoral; however, whether...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Endoleaks after endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: always reintervene or monitor with CTA?

Endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aneurysms requiring sealing above the renal arteries, with preservation of visceral vessels using fenestrated and/or branched devices (F/B-EVAR), has become...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Long-Term Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With ANOCA: A Clinical Reality to Consider?

Chronic stable angina (CSA) remains one of the most frequent reasons for referral to diagnostic coronary angiography (CAG). In a substantial proportion of these...