TCT 2025 | SELUTION4ISR: sirolimus-eluting balloon for in-stent restenosis

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to be a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary PCI practice. In the DES era, its incidence reaches 4–8% during the first year and persists at around 1% annually, accounting for over 10% of current PCI procedures. Although repeat DES implantation remains the guideline-recommended strategy (Class IA), layering multiple metallic components may compromise coronary flow and increase long-term event risk.

The SELUTION4ISR study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a sirolimus-eluting balloon (SELUTION SLR DEB) compared with standard treatment, consisting predominantly of DES re-implantation (~80%) and to a lesser extent plain balloon angioplasty (~20%).

This was a randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority trial including 418 patients with ISR in a single native coronary vessel previously treated with BMS or DES, with lesion length ≤26 mm and reference diameter 2.0–4.5 mm. Lesions with more than two stent layers, complex bifurcations, total occlusions, or visible thrombus were excluded.

The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, vessel-related MI, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization.

Read also: TCT 2025 | SELUTION DeNovo: sirolimus-eluting balloon vs. stent in de novo coronary lesions.

At 1-year follow-up, TLF occurred in 15.2% with SELUTION DEB vs. 13.5% with standard treatment, achieving non-inferiority (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.69–1.90; p=0.608). There were no significant differences in individual components: cardiac mortality (1.9% vs. 1.4%), target-vessel MI (7.1% vs. 4.8%), or target-vessel revascularization (11.9% vs. 11.5%). Safety event rates were also comparable.

Conclusion

SELUTION becomes the first sirolimus-eluting balloon to demonstrate non-inferiority versus current standard practice for ISR treatment, providing an effective alternative that avoids additional metal layers.

Presented by Donald E. Cutlip at TCT 2025 Late-Breaking Clinical Trials, October 26, San Francisco, USA.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism 2026

The 2026 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) introduces a conceptual shift by replacing the traditional “risk-based” classification with an...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...