TCT 2025 | SELUTION4ISR: sirolimus-eluting balloon for in-stent restenosis

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to be a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary PCI practice. In the DES era, its incidence reaches 4–8% during the first year and persists at around 1% annually, accounting for over 10% of current PCI procedures. Although repeat DES implantation remains the guideline-recommended strategy (Class IA), layering multiple metallic components may compromise coronary flow and increase long-term event risk.

The SELUTION4ISR study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a sirolimus-eluting balloon (SELUTION SLR DEB) compared with standard treatment, consisting predominantly of DES re-implantation (~80%) and to a lesser extent plain balloon angioplasty (~20%).

This was a randomized, multicenter, non-inferiority trial including 418 patients with ISR in a single native coronary vessel previously treated with BMS or DES, with lesion length ≤26 mm and reference diameter 2.0–4.5 mm. Lesions with more than two stent layers, complex bifurcations, total occlusions, or visible thrombus were excluded.

The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the composite of cardiac death, vessel-related MI, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization.

Read also: TCT 2025 | SELUTION DeNovo: sirolimus-eluting balloon vs. stent in de novo coronary lesions.

At 1-year follow-up, TLF occurred in 15.2% with SELUTION DEB vs. 13.5% with standard treatment, achieving non-inferiority (HR 1.14; 95% CI 0.69–1.90; p=0.608). There were no significant differences in individual components: cardiac mortality (1.9% vs. 1.4%), target-vessel MI (7.1% vs. 4.8%), or target-vessel revascularization (11.9% vs. 11.5%). Safety event rates were also comparable.

Conclusion

SELUTION becomes the first sirolimus-eluting balloon to demonstrate non-inferiority versus current standard practice for ISR treatment, providing an effective alternative that avoids additional metal layers.

Presented by Donald E. Cutlip at TCT 2025 Late-Breaking Clinical Trials, October 26, San Francisco, USA.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...