TCT 2025 | PARTNER 3 Trial 7-Year Outcomes: TAVR vs SAVR in Low-Risk Patients

The randomized PARTNER 3, which initially showed TAVR superiority when using the SAPIEN 3 valve over SAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis and low surgical risk, now presents its 7-year follow-up. The goal was to compare clinical and echocardiographic outcomes, and valve durability between the two strategies.

A total of 1000 patients were included (503 TAVR and 497 SAVR), mean age 73 and 1.9 % STS-PROM score. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, stroke, or rehospitalization (related to valve, procedure, or heart failure), assessed as time to first event, at 7 years.

At 7 years, the primary endpoint occurred in 22.7 % of the TAVR patients vs 27.3 % of SAVR patients (p = 0.01 for non-inferiority). There were no significant differences in the individual clinical endpoints: all-cause mortality was 14.2 % for TAVR vs 16.6 % for SAVR (p = 0.21), cardiovascular mortality 10.3 % vs 7.8 % (p = 0.27), stroke resulted similar between strategies, with 6.0 % vs 6.4 % (p = 0.72), as was valve, or cardiac failure related rehospitalization, with 10.7 % vs 7.5 % (p = 0.13). Neither were there differences in aortic reintervention rate (6.7 % vs 6.0 %; p = 0.69).

Read also: TCT 2025 | VICTORY Trial: super-high-pressure NC balloon vs. IVL in severely calcified coronary lesions.

Echocardiographic analysis showed 11.6 mmHg mean aortic gradient for TAVR vs 13.7 mmHg for SAVR (p = 0.02), with 1.84 vs 1.93 cm² valve areas (p = 0.42), respectively. Valve durability using VARC-3 BVF criteria was excellent and comparable (6.9 % vs 7.3 %). ≥Mild paravalvular leak was more common after TAVR, with no impact on survival. Quality-of-life (KCCQ) and NYHA functional class showed similar and sustained improvement sustained over follow-up.

Conclusion

In conclusion, 7-year clinical, hemodynamic, and valve durability outcomes of severe AS patients at low surgical risk, treated with TAVR using the SAPIEN 3, resulted comparable to SAVR outcomes. These findings support the long-term safety and efficacy of TAVR and suggest its potential to become a definitive treatment option for increasingly younger patients with prolonged life expectancy.

Presented by Michael J. Mack, MD & Martin B. Leon, MD at TCT 2025 (Late-Breaking Clinical Trials), October 27, San Francisco, USA.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....