TCT 2025 | VICTORY Trial: super-high-pressure NC balloon vs. IVL in severely calcified coronary lesions

Recent studies such as ECLIPSE have demonstrated the safety of non-compliant (NC) balloons compared with orbital atherectomy, while IVL has shown efficacy in registries and non-comparative studies. Still, a direct head-to-head evaluation was needed.

The VICTORY Trial (Intravascular Lithotripsy vs. Super-High-Pressure Non-Compliant Balloon for Treatment of Calcified and Refractory Coronary Lesions) was a prospective, multicenter, randomized non-inferiority study.

Patients with acute or chronic coronary syndromes and severely calcified lesions (OCT-guided) requiring DES implantation were included. STEMI and cardiogenic shock were excluded.

Participants were randomized 1:1 to lesion preparation with OPN non-compliant balloon (OPN NCB) or IVL. The primary endpoint was percentage stent expansion (SE) by OCT. Secondary endpoints included adequate (>80%) or optimal (>90%) expansion, procedural success, strategy success, and 30-day safety outcomes.

A total of 282 patients were randomized across Switzerland, Canada, and Poland. Mean age 71 years; 25% women; 30% diabetes; 40% prior MI; ~60% multivessel disease. Most lesions showed severe angiographic calcium and ≥270° calcium burden on OCT.

Regarding the primary outcome, final stent expansion was similar between groups (mean difference: 1.0%, 95% CI −2.45 to 4.45; superiority p=0.57; non-inferiority p<0.0001), confirming the non-inferiority of OPN NCB compared with IVL. The results were consistent across subgroup analyses.

Read also: TCT 2025 | ShortCUT Trial: intravascular lithotripsy vs. cutting balloon in calcified coronary lesions.

Final SE was similar between groups (mean difference 1.0%; 95% CI −2.45 to 4.45; superiority p=0.57; non-inferiority p<0.0001). Secondary outcomes were also comparable, including procedural success (92% vs. 86%) and strategy success (98.6% both). Safety outcomes showed low perforation rates (≤1%) and infrequent MACE (2.9% vs. 8.0%; p=0.081) without significant differences.

Conclusions

OPN NCB achieved stent expansion and safety outcomes similar to IVL, emerging as a more accessible and cost-effective option for OCT-guided treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions.

Presented by Matthias Bossard at TCT 2025 Late-Breaking Clinical Trials, October 26, San Francisco, USA.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Dr. Omar Tupayachi
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

EuroPCR 2026 | TAVI and Coronary Artery Disease: FFR-Guided PCI Showed Better Outcomes Than an Angiography-Guided Strategy

In patients undergoing TAVI, the concomitant presence of coronary artery disease continues to generate debate: whether coronary lesions should be treated before, during, or...

EuroPCR 2026 | Evolocumab Reduces Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior PCI Without Previous Myocardial Infarction: VESALIUS-CV Results

This presentation, delivered by Dr. Brian A. Bergmark and colleagues at EuroPCR 2026, detailed the results of the VESALIUS-CV trial, focusing specifically on the...

EuroPCR 2026 | Is It Safe to Stop Aspirin After One Month in MI Patients Undergoing PCI? TARGET-FIRST Analysis

This is a summary of the post-hoc analysis of the TARGET-FIRST study, presented by Dr. Giuseppe Tarantini at EuroPCR 2026, evaluating early aspirin discontinuation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

T-TEER: Beyond Traditional Pulmonary Hypertension Thresholds

Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with progressive functional deterioration, heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and increased mortality. In recent years, transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair...

Is left atrial appendage closure safe in patients with reduced ejection fraction?

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were excluded from the major randomized trials evaluating percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), and...

Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Spain: Sustained Growth and Favorable Real-World Outcomes

Oral anticoagulation remains the standard treatment for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, many patients have a high bleeding risk or contraindications...