The prevalence of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is significant; its prognosis is well known, and severe TR stages are associated with higher mortality and hospitalization for cardiac failure (CF). Seeing as valve disease tends to evolve over time, in advanced stages, we usually check on patients at specified intervals for early identification of potential hemodynamic complications…
MYVAL, a TAVR Balloon-Expandable Valve with Promising Results
TAVR has been shown beneficial over time, and with the development of new generation of prosthetic valves and implantation techniques, outcomes have been improved, reducing the incidence of leaks y and the need for definite pacemaker. This study looked at the evolution of 100 patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis treated with Myval THV from Meril…
EVOQUE: Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement, One-Year Outcomes
Treating tricuspid regurgitation (TR) has gained increasing importance in interventionism. There is abundant literature on the negative natural evolution of this condition and its unfavorable prognosis, as well as the clinical challenges associated to optimal medical treatment. Among its percutaneous treatment options, both edge-to-edge repair devices (TEER), as showed in TriValve and TRILUMINATE trials, and…
New Advances in Mitral Regurgitation Devices with Promising Results
Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a frequent valvulopathy and when the optimal medical treatment at maximum tolerated doses is not enough, surgery is the first course of action. And even though edge-to-edge repair with clips has seen substantial improvement, it is currently reserved for those at high risk of surgery. However, there is an increasing number…
Heterotopic Tricuspid Intervention: TricValve One-Year Outcomes
Severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) presents a reserved prognosis when not treated in time, seeing as systemic venous congestion might significantly limit quality of life in these patients. For many years it was thought diuretic therapy was the only option to treat these patients, since the surgical alternative offered suboptimal results and many patients were deemed…
Can Ultrasound Treat Aortic Stenosis?
Severe calcified aortic stenosis is a common condition that can currently be effectively treated with SAVR or TAVR. However, some patients, given comorbidities or anatomical characteristics, are not good candidates for these therapeutic alternatives. The non-invasive ultrasound therapy (NIUT) has surged as viable alternative. It claims ultrasound might act on calcified valves, and mobilize tissue…
Is AS Only Important When Severe?
Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive disease associated with morbidity and mortality, especially in severe cases. However, recent studies have revealed that moderate stenosis can also have unfavorable consequences in the course of the disease. One of the challenges lies in that determining its severity is sometimes difficult due to discrepancies between valve area, gradient,…
Low Gradient, Normal Flow Aortic Stenosis: Changes in Quality of Life with TAVR
There is no question as regards the recommended treatment for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, seeing as both transcatheter and surgical aortic valve replacement (TAVR and SAVR) have shown to significantly improve prognosis. This is despite the fact that there is still certain ambiguity around its characterization, which looks to define it according to hemodynamic severity…
CAPTIS, a Novel Cerebral Embolic Protection System in TAVR
The incidence of stroke after TAVR ranges between 2 and 5%, depending on the series, which has been associated with higher morbimortality, affecting patient quality of life and their psycho-social environment. Many cerebral embolic protection systems have been developed in response, and even though they have been shown beneficial in many studies, their role in…
Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices: How Useful are they in TAVR?
During TAVR, we often fear the possibility of a stroke, which occurs in approximately 1 – 2% of cases. In general, this phenomenon is caused by thrombi stemming from atherosclerotic or calcified plaque, depending on the etiology. Even though its incidence has declined with technology development and the increasing expertise of operators, it is still…
Is TAVR Beneficial in Cardiogenic Shock?
The presence of cardiogenic shock (CS) in a setting of aortic stenosis ranges from 1% to 4%. The prognosis for this scenario is ominous due to subendocardial ischemia, which presents as a decrease in ventricular preload and an increase in afterload. Aortic valvuloplasty has been used in this context, but, unfortunately, it has been associated…