Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become the standard treatment for elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. While this has led to the development of new devices with different features, evidence from randomized studies on these new scaffolds is limited. The randomized SCOPE I study (Safety and Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE Neo/TF Compared…
Real-World Results of Different Devices for TAVR
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) keeps growing in terms of the development of new devices, more extensive operator experience, and enhanced procedure planning. Nowadays, there are multiple device options, which depend on patient characteristics and operator experience. Two-arm studies compared these devices, analyzing the potential benefits of a certain valve over the others. This multicenter…
New-Generation ACURATE Neo2
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a therapeutical option for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Current guidelines recommend TAVR in patients ≥75 years with intermediate risk. One of the most frequent complications of this procedure is moderate or greater aortic regurgitation (AR) after implantation. Consequently, new valves have been developed to try and reduce…
SCOPE I: Acurate NEO vs Sapien 3, no non-inferiority at one year?
The randomized controlled study SCOPE 1 failed to show significant differences at one year between the self-expandable Acurate neo and the balloon expandable Sapien 3. The SCOPE 1 (Safety and Efficacy of the Symetis ACURATE neo/TF Compared to the Edwards SAPIEN 3 Bioprosthesis) compared the balloon expandable Sapien 3 (which has probably more data) against…