It has been long since the SYNTAX (NEJM 2009) came out comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) against coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). That emblematic study associated PCI with first generation drug eluting stents (Taxus) with increased major cardiac and cerebrovascular events (all-cause mortality, AMI, stroke, or any revascularization – MACCE) vs. CABG, at 5 years,…
Can Antiplatelet Therapy Affect the Life of Coronary Grafts?
The antiplatelet treatment strategy providing optimal balance between thrombotic and bleeding risks in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization surgery is unclear. What does seem somewhat certain is that some antiplatelet therapy is necessary to prevent early thrombosis, mainly in vein grafts, but (as opposed to what happens with angioplasty) there are other relevant factors such as…
FFR to Predict CABG Result: All Benefits in a Population Much Too Pure?
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) anastomosed to one vessel with normal or nearly normal fractional flow reserve (FFR) have poorer graft patency at one year compared against anastomosed grafts to vessels with functionally significant lesions shown by FFR. However, the recent study FARGO (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography Randomization for Graft Optimization) did not show…
Angiography Guided CABG Still Adequate
Fractional Flow reserve (FFR) guided myocardial revascularization surgery (CABG) has similar graft failure rate and clinical outcomes as angiography guided CABG. When planning PCI, the value of FFR for lesion assessment pose no questions, but we know little when it comes to CABG. Since the early start, back when Dr. Mason Sones performed catheterizations and…