Recommendations on occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology

 

The evolution in experience of the operators together with the continuous improvement of devices have allowed new procedures that we did not perform a few years ago and that we never imagined possible, not even for the most enthusiastic of interventional cardiologists.

Not a huge intellectual effort is required to say that the future will continue inexorably in the same direction. The same is happening in other specialties besides cardiology where surgery is being performed on increasingly complex cases.

However, it is logical that the progresses of science are not all positive news. More complex procedures take longer and automatically have higher radiation doses not only for the patient but also for medical and non-medical operators in the room.

In this sense, we believe it’s beneficial to highlight our concern about this issue in a multi-disciplinary framework group dedicated to radiation protection in interventional cardiology within the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) based in Vienna, Austria. Writing about “Recommendations on occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology”, it was decided to focus in the first instance on professional care and leave care of the patient until later.

We tried to write a practical approach where operators and ward staff can identify the most useful radiation protection measures and hope that their knowledge will influence an adequate prevention of stochastic as well as deterministic effects in the future. It gave us real satisfaction when a prestigious magazine, “Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions”, accepted our work for publication and, as such, we want to share this with all SOLACI partners.

Dr. Ariel Durán, FACC
SOLACI Radiation Safety Committee

recomendaciones_proteccion_radiologica
Ariel Durán

More articles by this author

Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: CABG + SAVR vs. TAVR + PCI: Data from Spanish Centers

Multiple randomized studies have shown comparable or superior efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) vs. coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).  However, many of...

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation: Surgical vs. Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair

While highly prevalent, tricuspid regurgitation is a notably undertreated valvulopathy. Its progression has been associated with higher mortality and significant disability. According to the...

ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Post TAVR Vascular Closure Devices

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a well-established option to treat elderly patients with severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis. Technical advances and device development...

Endovascular Treatment of Iliofemoral Disease for the Improvement of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) is a significant risk factor in the development of difficult-to-treat conditions, such as heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)....