Never ending controversy over the duration of post DES dual antiplatelet therapy

Original title: Second Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Implantation Followed by Six Versus Twelve-Month – Dual Antiplatelet Therapy- The SECURITY Randomized Clinical Trial. Reference: Antonio Colombo et al. J Am CollCardiol. 2014 Nov 18;64(20):2086-97.

The optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after second-generation DES implantation is still debated and apparently will remain controversial for some time.

The aim of this study was to test the non-inferiority of 6 versus 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing PCI with second-generation DES.

The SECURITY trial was a 1:1 randomized, multicenter, international, investigator-driven, non-inferiority study conducted between July 2009 and June 2014. Patients with stable or unstable angina or silent ischemia undergoing PCI with at least 1 second-generation DES were eligible. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, definite or probable stent thrombosis, and bleeding at 12 and 24 months.

1399 patients were included and randomized to receive 6 months (n = 682) versus 12 months (n = 717) double antiaggregation therapy. At one year follow up, primary end point composite was observed in 4.5% of patients in the 6 months arm versus 3.7% of patients in the 12 month arm (risk difference 0.8%; 95% CI −2.4% to 1.7%; p = 0.469). 

Given that the upper 95% CI limit was lower than the pre-set margin of 2%, the non-inferiority hypothesis was confirmed (p < 0.05). Finally, no differences were observed in definite or probable stent thrombosis at 12 months (0.3% with 6 months vs. 0.4% with 12 months; p = 0.694) and at 24 months of follow-up (0.1% vs. 0% respectively; p = 0.305).

Conclusion

In this low risk population, the non-inferiority hypothesis between 6 and 12 months of double antiaggregation therapy after second generation DES implantation was confirmed, taking into account cardiac death, infarction, stroke, definite/probable thrombosis and bleeding.

Editorial Comment

In the multivariable analysis, independent predictors of primary end point were +75 age, and type, number, diameter and length of implanted stents.

This study, as well as others recently published that test the opposite hypothesis (double antiaggregation for more than 12 months) all arrive to the conclusion that not all patients are equal and, more importantly, not all stents are equally effective. 

SOLACI

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...