ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex coronary lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. The IVUS-CHIP study was designed to evaluate whether a systematic IVUS-guided strategy with prespecified optimization criteria could reduce clinical events compared with conventional angiography in patients undergoing complex PCI.

Cobertura Científica SOLACI ACC 2026

This was a randomized, multicenter clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio that enrolled 2,020 patients with silent ischemia, stable angina, unstable angina, or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, all presenting with complex coronary lesions. Complexity criteria included severe calcification, ostial lesions, true bifurcations with side branches >2.5 mm, left main coronary artery disease, chronic total occlusions, in-stent restenosis, and long lesions (>28 mm). Patients were assigned to IVUS-guided PCI (n=1,010) or angiography-guided PCI (n=1,010). The mean age was 69 years, 80% were male, with a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction of approximately 52–53%.

The primary endpoint was target vessel failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target vessel revascularization.

The IVUS-guided strategy failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in the primary endpoint compared with angiography-guided PCI. Target vessel failure occurred in 13.9% of patients in the IVUS group versus 11.1% in the angiography group (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.97–1.60). No significant differences were observed in the individual components of the primary endpoint or in most secondary endpoints.

Read also: ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio.

However, IVUS use was associated with a lower incidence of definite stent thrombosis (0.2% vs. 1.0%; HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.04–0.90) and definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.5% vs. 1.5%; HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.12–0.90).

Conclusion

In patients undergoing high-risk complex PCI, a systematic IVUS-guided strategy did not significantly reduce the incidence of target vessel failure compared with conventional angiographic guidance.

Original Title: Intravascular Ultrasound Guided or Angiography Guided Complex High-Risk PCI (IVUS-CHIP Trial).


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

EuroPCR 2026 | TAVI and Coronary Artery Disease: FFR-Guided PCI Showed Better Outcomes Than an Angiography-Guided Strategy

In patients undergoing TAVI, the concomitant presence of coronary artery disease continues to generate debate: whether coronary lesions should be treated before, during, or...

EuroPCR 2026 | Evolocumab Reduces Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Prior PCI Without Previous Myocardial Infarction: VESALIUS-CV Results

This presentation, delivered by Dr. Brian A. Bergmark and colleagues at EuroPCR 2026, detailed the results of the VESALIUS-CV trial, focusing specifically on the...

EuroPCR 2026 | Is It Safe to Stop Aspirin After One Month in MI Patients Undergoing PCI? TARGET-FIRST Analysis

This is a summary of the post-hoc analysis of the TARGET-FIRST study, presented by Dr. Giuseppe Tarantini at EuroPCR 2026, evaluating early aspirin discontinuation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

T-TEER: Beyond Traditional Pulmonary Hypertension Thresholds

Significant tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with progressive functional deterioration, heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, and increased mortality. In recent years, transcatheter tricuspid edge-to-edge repair...

Is left atrial appendage closure safe in patients with reduced ejection fraction?

Patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were excluded from the major randomized trials evaluating percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC), and...

Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Spain: Sustained Growth and Favorable Real-World Outcomes

Oral anticoagulation remains the standard treatment for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. However, many patients have a high bleeding risk or contraindications...