ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex coronary lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. The IVUS-CHIP study was designed to evaluate whether a systematic IVUS-guided strategy with prespecified optimization criteria could reduce clinical events compared with conventional angiography in patients undergoing complex PCI.

Cobertura Científica SOLACI ACC 2026

This was a randomized, multicenter clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio that enrolled 2,020 patients with silent ischemia, stable angina, unstable angina, or non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome, all presenting with complex coronary lesions. Complexity criteria included severe calcification, ostial lesions, true bifurcations with side branches >2.5 mm, left main coronary artery disease, chronic total occlusions, in-stent restenosis, and long lesions (>28 mm). Patients were assigned to IVUS-guided PCI (n=1,010) or angiography-guided PCI (n=1,010). The mean age was 69 years, 80% were male, with a high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction of approximately 52–53%.

The primary endpoint was target vessel failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target vessel revascularization.

The IVUS-guided strategy failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in the primary endpoint compared with angiography-guided PCI. Target vessel failure occurred in 13.9% of patients in the IVUS group versus 11.1% in the angiography group (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.97–1.60). No significant differences were observed in the individual components of the primary endpoint or in most secondary endpoints.

Read also: ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio.

However, IVUS use was associated with a lower incidence of definite stent thrombosis (0.2% vs. 1.0%; HR 0.20; 95% CI 0.04–0.90) and definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.5% vs. 1.5%; HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.12–0.90).

Conclusion

In patients undergoing high-risk complex PCI, a systematic IVUS-guided strategy did not significantly reduce the incidence of target vessel failure compared with conventional angiographic guidance.

Original Title: Intravascular Ultrasound Guided or Angiography Guided Complex High-Risk PCI (IVUS-CHIP Trial).


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...