Net clinical benefit of bivalirudin in STEMI patients

Original title: Bivalirudin Versus Heparin With or Without Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients With STEMI Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Pooled Patient-Level Analysis From the HORIZONS-AMI and EUROMAX Trials. Reference: Stone GW et al. J Am CollCardiol. 2015 Jan 6;65(1):27-38.

The HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) that included 3602 STEMI patients undergoing PCI, showed that bivalirudin had lower bleeding and mortality rates but higher acute stent thrombosis comparted to heparin combined with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. 

Since the HORIZONS-AMI trial, PCI techniques have been enhanced with the use of more potent P2Y12 inhibitors, the radial approach and pre-hospital medication administration, included in the EUROMAX (European Ambulance Acute Coronary Syndrome Angiography, which included 2218 patients to bivalirudin vs. heparin with or without glycoprotein inhibitors before primary PCI).

Both trials randomized a total of 5800 patients to bivalirudin (n=2889) vs heparin, with or without glycoprotein inhibitors (n=2911). The radial approach was used in 21.3% of patients and the new antiaggregants (ticagrelor/prasugrel) were used in 18.1% of patients. The inhibitors were used in 84.8% of the control group.

Bivalirudin, compared to heparin with or without IIb IIIa inhibitors resulted in reduced 30 day rates of major bleeding (4.2% vs 7.8%; RR0.53; CI 95% 0.43 to 0.66; p< 0.0001), thrombocytopenia (1.4% vs 2.9%, RR 0.48; CI 95% 0.33 to 0.71; p=0.0002) and cardiac death (2.0% vs 2.9%; RR 0.70; CI 95% 0.50 to 0.97; p=0.03). There were no difference in reinfarction, ischemic driven ischemia, stroke and all-cause mortality rates.

Bivalirudin did result in increased stent thrombosis rates at 24 hours (1.2% vs 0.2%; RR 6.04; CI 95% 2.55 to 14.31; p< 0.0001) but subacute thrombosis saw no significant differences.

The composite of adverse clinical events was lower with bivalirudin (8.8% vs 11.9%; RR 0.74; CI 95% 0.63 to 0.86; p< 0.0001). There was no significant heterogeneity between the two trials endpoint outcomes, and results were consistent across all major subgroups of patients.

Conclusion

Despite an increase of acute thrombosis, PCI with bivalirudin improves net combined outcomes with significant reduction in major bleeding, thrombocytopenia and transfusions, compared to heparin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa.

Editorial Comment

Radial approach and new antiaggregant rates were approximately 20%, which appears enough to change the original HORIZONS outcomes. The EUROMAX design seems to better reflect the everyday practice, with provisional use of IIb/IIIa inhibitors and frequent use of the radial access. Despite the great number of studies similar to this one, bivalirudin does not reach the everyday practice. One of the reasons behind this could be costs, but there may be other reasons for interventional cardiologists to resist incorporating this drug.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....