Net clinical benefit of bivalirudin in STEMI patients

Original title: Bivalirudin Versus Heparin With or Without Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Patients With STEMI Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Pooled Patient-Level Analysis From the HORIZONS-AMI and EUROMAX Trials. Reference: Stone GW et al. J Am CollCardiol. 2015 Jan 6;65(1):27-38.

The HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes with RevasculariZatiON and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) that included 3602 STEMI patients undergoing PCI, showed that bivalirudin had lower bleeding and mortality rates but higher acute stent thrombosis comparted to heparin combined with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. 

Since the HORIZONS-AMI trial, PCI techniques have been enhanced with the use of more potent P2Y12 inhibitors, the radial approach and pre-hospital medication administration, included in the EUROMAX (European Ambulance Acute Coronary Syndrome Angiography, which included 2218 patients to bivalirudin vs. heparin with or without glycoprotein inhibitors before primary PCI).

Both trials randomized a total of 5800 patients to bivalirudin (n=2889) vs heparin, with or without glycoprotein inhibitors (n=2911). The radial approach was used in 21.3% of patients and the new antiaggregants (ticagrelor/prasugrel) were used in 18.1% of patients. The inhibitors were used in 84.8% of the control group.

Bivalirudin, compared to heparin with or without IIb IIIa inhibitors resulted in reduced 30 day rates of major bleeding (4.2% vs 7.8%; RR0.53; CI 95% 0.43 to 0.66; p< 0.0001), thrombocytopenia (1.4% vs 2.9%, RR 0.48; CI 95% 0.33 to 0.71; p=0.0002) and cardiac death (2.0% vs 2.9%; RR 0.70; CI 95% 0.50 to 0.97; p=0.03). There were no difference in reinfarction, ischemic driven ischemia, stroke and all-cause mortality rates.

Bivalirudin did result in increased stent thrombosis rates at 24 hours (1.2% vs 0.2%; RR 6.04; CI 95% 2.55 to 14.31; p< 0.0001) but subacute thrombosis saw no significant differences.

The composite of adverse clinical events was lower with bivalirudin (8.8% vs 11.9%; RR 0.74; CI 95% 0.63 to 0.86; p< 0.0001). There was no significant heterogeneity between the two trials endpoint outcomes, and results were consistent across all major subgroups of patients.

Conclusion

Despite an increase of acute thrombosis, PCI with bivalirudin improves net combined outcomes with significant reduction in major bleeding, thrombocytopenia and transfusions, compared to heparin with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa.

Editorial Comment

Radial approach and new antiaggregant rates were approximately 20%, which appears enough to change the original HORIZONS outcomes. The EUROMAX design seems to better reflect the everyday practice, with provisional use of IIb/IIIa inhibitors and frequent use of the radial access. Despite the great number of studies similar to this one, bivalirudin does not reach the everyday practice. One of the reasons behind this could be costs, but there may be other reasons for interventional cardiologists to resist incorporating this drug.

SOLACI

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

EARLY TAVR: Impact of Age on Outcomes of Early TAVR in Asymptomatic Patients

Asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis represents an increasingly common clinical challenge. Although current guidelines recommend intervention once symptoms develop or left ventricular dysfunction occurs, concerns...