DUTCH PEERS: Everolimus DES versus zotarolimus DES

This study randomized 1:1,  906 patients to receive zotarolimus-eluting stent and 905 patients to receive everolimus-eluting stent. The clinical and angiographic characteristics of both groups were similar with approximately 45% of the population experiencing an acute coronary syndrome. There were no significant differences in major cardiac events between the two stents with 6.1% to for zotarolimus and 5.1%  for everolimus. There were no differences in the rate of stent thrombosis. Both stents showed safety and efficacy.

2_clemens_von_birgelen
Clemens von Birgelen
2013-10-31

Original title: DUTCH PEERS (TWENTE II): A Prospective, Randomized, “All-Comers” Trial of Third-Generation Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents vs. Everolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents

More articles by this author

TRANSLATE-POPS: Routine measurement of platelet aggregation generates a minimal impact on the treatment setting

The high platelet reactivity is associated with adverse events after stent implantation. Current guidelines consider the measurement of aggregability as a class IIB and...

TATORT-NSTEMI: Routinely thromboaspiration in patients with non ST-elevation AMI

Thromboaspiration in patients with ST-elevation is being questioned while in patients without elevation this strategy has not been studied. The study included 440 patients...

REPRISE II: LOTUS valve for percutaneous aortic valve replacement

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the new device in patients with severe aortic stenosis at high...

GIANT: Evaluation of the genetic profile of CYP2C19 in patients undergoing primary angioplasty

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact resistance thienopyridines through genetic analysis of CYP2C19 receptor. The primary endpoint was  a...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

ACC 2026 | Protect The Head-To-Head Trial: Randomized Comparison Between Emboliner and Sentinel During TAVI

Ischemic stroke remains one of the most feared complications of TAVI, with a relatively low but persistent incidence of 2–4%, without significant reduction over...

ACC 2026 | PRO-TAVI Trial: Deferring Coronary Angioplasty in Patients Undergoing TAVI

Coronary artery disease is common in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI. Current guidelines recommend considering revascularization in significant coronary lesions, particularly in...