The SAPIEN 3 Valve Resulted Superior to Surgery in an Observational Study

The last generation of the balloon expandable valve resulted superior to surgery in intermediate riskpatients, in a registry analyzis. Patients treated with the SAPIEN 3 valve showed lower rates of death, stroke and paravalvular leak at one year than patients undergoing surgery.

This third generation improves the SAPIEN XT with a skirt designed to prevent paravalvular leak, improved coaxial alignment with the annulus and more precise positioning.

In 2015 results at 30 days had been presented and now results at one year confirm non inferiority and superiority of the valve compared to surgery in 1077 intermediate risk patients matched with propensity score.

Patients in this registry were compared to those undergoing surgery from the PARTNER 2A trial.

Mortality at one year resulted 7.4% for TAVI vs 13% for surgery (p<0.001); strokeresulted4.6% vs. 8.2% respectively (p=0.04) and moderate paravalvular leak, more than 1.5% vs 1.2% respectively (p=0.0149).

Aortic stenosis symptoms improved significantly with 94% of patients inNYHAfunctional class I or II compared to the 73% in NYHAfunctional class III or IV at baseline.

13% of those undergoing TAVI required definite pacemaker vs. 12% in the surgery group from PARTNER 2A.

More articles by this author

PARTNER 2A: TAVI Not Inferior to Surgery in Intermediate Risk Patients

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) with the new generation balloon expandable valve is at least as good as surgery in intermediate risk patients with...

CoreValve US Pivotal: at 3 Years, the Self-Expanding Valve Maintains Its Advantage vs. Surgery

At 3 year follow up, the CoreValve US Pivotal study on high risk elderly patients, the self-expanding valve showed a lasting benefit vs. surgery. These...

PARTNER 1 in +90 Year Old Patients: TAVI and the Age Paradox

A new analyzis of the PARTNER 1 trial showed that patients over 90 undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) show no increase in mortality...

DANAMI 3: Deferred Stenting and Ischemic Postconditioning Have No Benefit in Primary PCI

Both ischemic postconditioning and deferred stenting showed no benefit in randomized studies conducted as part of the DANAMI 3 program. Both the DANAMI 3-DEFER and...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...