The Effect of Age in Patients with Triple Vessel CAD Undergoing PCI vs. Surgery

Original Title: Effects of Age and Sex on Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Relative to Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Triple Vessel Coronary Artery Disease. Reference: KyoheiYamaji et al. Circulation. 2016 Mar 23. [Epub ahead of print].

 

Sex and age are factors that are often considered in the daily practice to decide between PCI or surgery.

The multicenter CREDO-Kyoto trial included 25816 patients; 5651 (men n=3998 and women n=1653) had triple vessel CAD and were considered good candidates for revascularization both with PCI and CABG (PCI n=3,165 and CABG n=2,486).

Patients were divided in three groups according to age tertile: ≤65 years (n=1,972), 66-73 years (n=1,820), and ≥74 years (n=1,859).

There was an excess mortality risk in ≥74 year old patients undergoing PCI compared to those undergoing CABG (HR 1.40, CI 95% 1.10 to 1.79; p=0.006), whereas this risk was neutral for ≤65 year old patients (HR 1.05, CI 95% 0.73 to 1.53; p=0.78) and also neutral for the group between 66 and 73 years of age (HR 1.03, CI 95% 0.78 to 1.36; p=0.85).

The excess mortality risk in the PCI group was significant in men (HR 1.24, CI 95% 1.03 to 1.50; p=0.02) and tended to be significant in women (HR 1.34 IC 95% 0.98 a 1.84; p=0.07).

Conclusion
There was a significant association between age and mortality risk in ≥74 year old patients with triple vessel CAD undergoing PCI compared to those undergoing CABG. The risk was neutral in younger patients.

More articles by this author

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

CRABBIS Trial: Comparison of Different Provisional Stenting Sequences

Provisional stenting (PS) is the gold standard for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL). Moreover, recent studies such...

Andromeda Trial: Meta-Analysis of Drug Coated Balloon vs. DES in Small Vessel DeNovo Lesions

The use of coronary stents vs plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), has allowed to reduce recoil and limiting flow dissection which were major limitation...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Earlier studies comparing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) vs coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) have shown fewer events at long term for the surgical strategy.  However,...

ACC 2025 | API-CAT: Reduced vs. Full Dose Extended Anticoagulation in Patients with Cancer Related VTE

The risk of cancer related recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) will drop over time, while bleeding risk will persist. At present, it is recommended we...