The Effect of Age in Patients with Triple Vessel CAD Undergoing PCI vs. Surgery

Original Title: Effects of Age and Sex on Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Relative to Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Triple Vessel Coronary Artery Disease. Reference: KyoheiYamaji et al. Circulation. 2016 Mar 23. [Epub ahead of print].

 

Sex and age are factors that are often considered in the daily practice to decide between PCI or surgery.

The multicenter CREDO-Kyoto trial included 25816 patients; 5651 (men n=3998 and women n=1653) had triple vessel CAD and were considered good candidates for revascularization both with PCI and CABG (PCI n=3,165 and CABG n=2,486).

Patients were divided in three groups according to age tertile: ≤65 years (n=1,972), 66-73 years (n=1,820), and ≥74 years (n=1,859).

There was an excess mortality risk in ≥74 year old patients undergoing PCI compared to those undergoing CABG (HR 1.40, CI 95% 1.10 to 1.79; p=0.006), whereas this risk was neutral for ≤65 year old patients (HR 1.05, CI 95% 0.73 to 1.53; p=0.78) and also neutral for the group between 66 and 73 years of age (HR 1.03, CI 95% 0.78 to 1.36; p=0.85).

The excess mortality risk in the PCI group was significant in men (HR 1.24, CI 95% 1.03 to 1.50; p=0.02) and tended to be significant in women (HR 1.34 IC 95% 0.98 a 1.84; p=0.07).

Conclusion
There was a significant association between age and mortality risk in ≥74 year old patients with triple vessel CAD undergoing PCI compared to those undergoing CABG. The risk was neutral in younger patients.

More articles by this author

ACC 2026 | DKCRUSH VIII: IVUS or angiography to guide PCI in complex coronary bifurcations

Intracoronary imaging guidance has become an established recommended strategy in complex coronary lesions. In the specific setting of complex bifurcations, uncertainty remained regarding the...

ACC 2026 | OPTIMAL: IVUS Guidance in PCI of the Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is considered an equivalent alternative to coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with left main coronary artery (LMCA) stenosis and...

ACC 2026 | IVUS-CHIP Trial: Intravascular ultrasound–guided versus angiography-guided complex PCI

Optimization of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions remains a relevant clinical challenge. In this context, the IVUS-CHIP trial was designed to evaluate...

ACC 2026 | ALL-RISE Trial: Coronary Physiological Assessment Using FFRangio

Coronary physiological assessment using pressure-wire techniques (FFR/iFR) carries a Class IA recommendation in ACC/AHA guidelines; however, its use remains limited due to factors such...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Therapeutic strategies in carotid free-floating thrombus: evidence and controversies

Carotid free-floating thrombus (cFFT) is a rare entity with a high embolic risk, associated with acute neurological events such as stroke or transient ischemic...

The Two Sides of the Coin: What Do CHAMPION-AF and CLOSURE-AF Teach Us About Left Atrial Appendage Closure?

Letter to the editor: Juan Manuel Pérez Asorey Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) is currently going through one of the most interesting stages of...

CLOSURE-AF: Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure versus Medical Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and high bleeding risk; however, comparative...