Aortic Angulation: Impact on the Success of TAVR

Original Title: Aortic Angulation Attenuates Procedural Success Following Self-Expandable But Not Balloon-Expandable TAVR.

Reference: Abramowitz Y  et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Jul 8. [Epub ahead of print].

 

Impact of Post TAVR Aortic Angulation

The angulation degree between aorta and heart can make precise valve implantation challenging, especially extreme angulation, such as a horizontal aortic root.

As obvious as it may seem, there is limited data on the impact of aortic angulation in TAVR.

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of aortic angulation immediately after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR).

The study included 582 patients undergoing TAVR that had prior procedure CT scans available for aortic angulation evaluation.

End points were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions.

Mean aortic angulation was 47.3 ± 8.7°, and patients were divided in two groups: <48° or ≥48° angulation.

In 480 patients receiving balloon expandable valves, the aorta did not influence acute periprocedural success or short term clinical outcomes.

On the contrary, in 102 patients receiving self-expandable valves, increased aortic angulation attenuated acute periprocedural success (area under the curve: 0.73; CI 95% 0.61 to 0.85; p = 0.008).

The numerical cutoff for aortic angulation with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity for device success was in fact ≥48° (sensitivity 85%, specificity 61%).

Patients with ≥48 angulation receiving self-expandable valves often needed a second valve and post dilation, had longer fluoroscopy time and increased device embolization and mild or greater than mild paravalvular regurgitation.

Mortality at 30 days was not influenced by device angulation.

 

Conclusion

Increased aortic root angulation can have a negative impact in acute periprocedural success in patients receiving self-expandable aortic valves but no in patients receiving balloon expandable valves.

 

Editorial Comment

Future studies with new devices should include aortic angulation as a factor to assess. New self-expandable repositionable and retrievable valves could solve this problem: during release (when presenting valve waist at annulus level) it is possible to push the whole system so that it “copies” the angulation between aorta and heart and to complete a practically horizontal release.

 

We value your opinion. You are more than welcome to leave your comments, thoughts, questions or suggestions here below.

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....