TAVI Frailty Indices: We Should Start Using Them

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

TAVI Frailty IndicesFrailty should be taken into account when deciding transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Even though several scales of frailty are available, they are yet to be tested in this group, with this strategy.

 

The study analyzed 101 patients, frailty was assessed clinically according to the following tests:

  • Katz index of Independence of Activity in Daily Living (KI of ADL),
  • Elderly Mobility Scale (EMS),
  • Canadian Study of Health and Aging (CSHA),
  • 5-meters walking test (5MWT),
  • Hand Grip,
  • Identification Senior at Risk.

 

Population mean age was 81, 61 patients were women, most were symptomatic and in functional class III/IV. Mean aortic area was 0.6 (0.4 to 0.8) cm2 and mean gradient was 87 (71-108) mmHg. EuroSCORE I was 16.5% and STS score was 15.4%.

 

91.1% of procedures was performed under general anesthesia, and the transfemoral was the most used approach (77.2%), followed by the transapical (20.8%) and the aortic (2%).

 

At one year, all-cause mortality was 17.8%. According to 5MWT, 17.8% were frail, CSHA scale 16.9%, Katz Index 17.8%, Hand Grip 6.9% and ISAR 52.5%. Frailty indices were strongly associated to all-cause mortality at one year.

 

Adjusted analysis confirmed the association between the different indices of frailty and all-cause mortality at one year. Small changes in the 5MWT (1 second increase), EMS (one point reduction) and one CSHA increase (one point) resulted in a three-fold mortality increase.

 

Conclusion

This study confirms most frailty indices have a strong capacity to predict mortality at 12 months. In TAVI candidates, the use of frailty indices such as the 5MWT, EMS, and the Hand Grip test, yield good results.

 

Editorial Comment

Frailty is increasingly being evaluated in TAVI candidates. This analysis shows that, even though there is no specific test to assess frailty, the combination of them provides significant information on high risk groups, however difficult it may be to leave out a patient based on this assessment. We still require further information, we should continue to research to find out which one group will not benefit of transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava. Favaloro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

 

Original Title: Impact of frailty on mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Reference: Pawel Kleczynski, et al. Am Heart J 2017;185:52-8.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...