Positive Outcomes of CoreValve Evolut in Large Population

The Evolut R, as well as its predecessor the CoreValve, is a self-expandable valve, supra-annular, made of porcine pericardium in a nitinol frame. Amongst its improvements, it has a better profile and the option to resheath. This makes it fully repositionable and even recapturable.

 La válvula CoreValve Evolut R arroja resultados positivos en una población importante de pacientes La Evolut R, al igual que su predecesora CoreValve, es una válvula autoexpandible, supra-anular, de pericardio porcino en un stent de nitinol. Entre las mejoras de esta válvula se pueden enumerar su mejor perfil y la posibilidad de re-envainarla. Esto la hace completamente reposicionable e incluso recapturable. Faltaba ver si estas ventajas técnicas se traducirían en ventajas clínicas (lo cual es -en definitiva- lo que importa) en una población grande de pacientes del mundo real. El estudio FORWARD (CoreValve Evolut R FORWARD) es un registro prospectivo que incluyó 1038 pacientes de 53 centros y cuatro continentes. Los pacientes tuvieron una edad media de 81.8 ± 6.2 años y un STS de 5.5 ± 4.5%, lo cual constituye un riesgo intermedio y coincide con la tendencia actual de la práctica clínica. La capacidad de reposicionar la válvula debió ser utilizada en el 25.8% de los pacientes, característica que permitió el implante de una sola válvula en el lugar correcto en el 98.9% de los casos. A 30 días, la mortalidad fue del 1.9% y el stroke incapacitante del 1.8%. Solo el 1.9% de los pacientes presentó insuficiencia aórtica moderada a severa; la tasa de marcapaso definitivo fue del 17.5%. Ambos datos están por debajo de lo que mostró el estudio SURTAVI con la CoreValve en una población similar (3.4% y 25.9% respectivamente) y la mejora se puede atribuir a la posibilidad de reposicionar el dispositivo. Conclusión La nueva generación de la válvula autoexpandible es segura y efectiva en pacientes con estenosis aórtica severa no seleccionados del mundo real. Comentario editorial La mortalidad por cualquier causa del 1.9% está claramente por debajo del 5.5% esperado según el score de STS y en sintonía con la del 1.1% descripta en el registro que testeó la última generación de la válvula balón expandible SAPIEN 3 en una población similar. El 98% de los pacientes fueron tratados por acceso femoral, lo cual también es la tendencia mundial gracias a la significativa disminución del perfil de los dispositivos. Afortunadamente, la enorme mayoría de las mejoras técnicas que han incorporado los nuevos dispositivos (tanto este como la competencia) han logrado traducirse en mejoras clínicas para los pacientes, logrando reducir la insuficiencia paravalvular, la tasa de marcapaso y las complicaciones vasculares. Título original: Clinical Outcomes With a Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prosthesis. The International FORWARD Study. Referencia: Eberhard Grube et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:845–53.

We only needed to confirm these technical advantages would translate into clinical advantages (which is what really matters) in a large population of patients in the real world. 

 

The FORWARD study (CoreValve Evolut R FORWARD) is a prospective registry including 1038 patients from 53 centers across four continents.


Also Read: REPRISE III: Lotus and CoreValve Measured in High Risk or Inoperable Patients”.


Patients were 81.8 ± 6.2 mean age and had 5.5 ± 4.5% STS, which puts them at intermediate risk, matching the current trend in clinical practice. 

 

The repositioning feature was applied in 25.8% of patients, which allowed for a single valve to be successfully implanted in the proper anatomic location in 98.9% of patients. 

 

At 30 days, mortality was 1.9% and disabling stroke was 1.8%.


Also read: Evolut R: Clinical Outcomes Better than 1st Gen CoreValve”.


Only 1.9% of patients presented moderate to severe aortic regurgitation; definite pacemaker rate was 17.5%. Both data are below the SURTAVI outcomes, which tested CoreValve in a similar population (3.4% and 25.9% respectively), and the improvement can be attributed to its repositionable capacity.

 

Conclusion

The new generation self-expandable valve is safe and effective in unselected patients with severe aortic stenosis in the real world. 

 

Editorial Comment

The 1.9% all-cause mortality rate is clearly under the expected 5.5% (as per STS score) and matches the 1.1% described in the registry that tested the last SAPIEN 3 self-expandable valve in a similar population.

 

98% of patients were treated via femoral access, which is also the latest world trend, given that it significantly reduces device profile.

 

Fortunately, the vast majority of technical improvements incorporated to the new devices (both this one and the competition’s) has been successfully translated into clinical improvements for patients, reducing paravalvular regurgitation, pacemaker implantation rate and vascular complications. 

 

Original title: Clinical Outcomes with a Repositionable Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Prosthesis. The International FORWARD Study.

Reference: Eberhard Grube et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:845–53.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: What Should Be our Approach?

Approximately 3% of the population over 65 years old has aortic stenosis. Current guidelines recommend valve replacement for patients with symptoms or an ejection...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Evolution of Small Balloon-Expandable Valves

Small aortic rings (20 mm) have posed a significant challenge for both surgery and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) due to their association with an...

TCT 2024 | Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis: What Should Be our Approach?

Approximately 3% of the population over 65 years old has aortic stenosis. Current guidelines recommend valve replacement for patients with symptoms or an ejection...

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...