Clinical Utility of CT-Derived FFR for Decision-Making

In this large international multicenter population, computed-tomography (CT)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) modified treatment recommendation in two-thirds of subjects compared with CT angiography alone, and it was associated with less negative invasive angiographies. It also predicted revascularization and identified low-risk patients.

A non-invasive means to know the anatomy and function of patients with stable chronic angina might decrease the number of invasive angiographies (mainly those whose final result are normal coronary arteries).

 

ADVANCE is a large prospective multicenter registry assessing coronary computerized tomography angiography and CT-derived fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) in real-world patients. Its aim was to determine the impact of this diagnostic pathway on decision-making, downstream need for invasive coronary angiography, revascularization, and major cardiovascular events.


Read also: Cautious Administration of Supplemental 02, Especially in Acute Stroke or MI.


A total of 5083 patients with symptoms compatible with chronic ischemic heart disease and atherosclerosis on conventional CT angiography were enrolled at 38 international sites from 2015 to 2017.

 

The primary endpoint was reclassification between core lab decisions based on angiography alone vs. angiography plus FFRCT.

 

With information from FFRCT, the initial decision changed through reclassification in 66.9% of patients.


Read also: Safety of Combining New Anticoagulant Agents and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.


Non-significant coronary disease appeared in conventional invasive angiography in only 14.4% of patients with FFRCT ≤0.8 compared with 43.8% of patients with FFRCT ≥0.8 (p < 0.0001).

 

Ultimately, 72.3% of patients who underwent a conventional invasive coronary angiography due to FFRCT ≤0.8 underwent revascularization.

 

No death or infarction occurred within 90 days in patients with FFRCT >0.8.


Read also: Surprises in the Physiopathology of Critical Ischemia.


Ten years ago, computerized tomography angiography threatened to replace conventional invasive angiography (experts predicted that the cath lab would only be used for angioplasties).

 

During these 10 years, invasive functional assessment of lesions (through FFR and instantaneous wave-free ratio [iFR]) became the gold standard and tomography would not be left behind; that is how FFRCT was born. Again, tomography experts promise that, in 10 years, invasive coronary angiographies will no longer be necessary. The answer will probably be related with FFRCT software and equipment costs; however, there will undoubtedly come a time when tomography replaces diagnostic studies.

 

Original title: Real-World Clinical Utility and Impact on Clinical Decision-Making of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Lessons from the ADVANCE Registry.

Reference: Timothy A. Fairbairn et al. European Heart Journal (2018) 39, 3701-3711.

 

ehy530-abierto


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...