E-Cigarettes: No Definitive Evidence on Their Potential Cardiovascular Effect, but Some Suggest Caution

E-cigarettes may bring about cardiac risk according to a new literature review soon to be published in J Am Coll Cardiol. The evidence on potential harm is not definitive, but some experts suggest caution in their use until there is more solid evidence.

E-cigarettes have been advertised as a healthy alternative to traditional cigarettes and an aid for tobacco cessation, but recent evidence suggests that they might cause adverse cardiovascular events.

 

Such events involve endothelial function, vascular stiffness, vasoconstriction, heart rate, blood pressure, inflammation, oxidative stress, and platelet function (all of which have already been observed with e-cigarettes). While e-cigarettes are widely believed to be safe (in terms of both cardiovascular risk and cancer), the truth is that they have not been studied enough. In fact, we could say that there is not enough solid evidence confirming that e-cigarettes even help people to quit smoking conventional cigarettes.


Read also: Several Features Define a Hostile Neck in AAA patients, but Only One Makes the Difference.


These devices can only be considered another tool to help people quit smoking.

 

If they do help smokers to quit conventional cigarettes, their potential for public health benefit is huge. However, this potential benefit must be balanced against their long-term health risks, which are still unknown.

 

Researchers reviewed 14 studies (all of them carried out in developed countries) that suggest possible cardiovascular harm and note that e-cigarettes are available in most countries around the world without any regulation.


Read also: Early Strut Coverage and Its Implications for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy.


We have a responsibility to inform our patients that e-cigarettes contain chemicals whose long-term effects are currently unknown. For smokers, this may be the lesser evil, but we should emphasize the fact that we still lack enough evidence.

 

Original title: 2018 ACC Expert Consensus Decision Pathway on Tobacco Cessation Treatment.

Reference: Barua RS et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; Epub ahead of print.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

Patients at High Risk of Bleeding After Coronary Angioplasty: Are Risk Assessment Tools ARC-HBR and PRECISE-DAPT Useful?

Patients undergoing coronary stenting typically receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for 6 to 12 months, consisting of a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor and aspirin. While DAPT...

ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies

BHF PROTECT-TAVI (Kharbanda RK, Kennedy J, Dodd M, et al.)The largest randomized  trial carried out across 33 UK centers between 2020 and 2024, assessing...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...