Is Individual Operator Experience Important in TAVR?

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a successful alternative for inoperable patients and a non-inferior alternative for high- and intermediate-risk patients. While its evolution depending on site experience has been analyzed, there is currently very little information regarding the impact of operator individual experience.

Terapia endovascular en stroke: mucha evidencia y pocos operadores entrenadosThis study analyzed 8771 procedures performed by 207 different operators. High-volume operators were defined as those performing ≥80 procedures/year; intermediate-volume operators were those performing between 24 and 79 procedures/year, and low-volume operators, <24 procedures/year. The “learning curve” of these operators was excluded so as to mitigate the incidence of complications that could bias results.

 

Patients of high-volume operators had a significantly lower in-hospital risk for death, stroke, and acute myocardial infarction (odds ratio: 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.37 to 0.93) compared with low-volume operators.


Read also: PCI Mortality and Volume in One Center: Associated?


Patients of operators who performed >200 procedures during the prior year had a significantly lower risk for post-procedural stroke (odds ratio: 0.41; 95% confidence interval: 0.17 to 0.97) and less in-hospital events (odds ratio: 0.45; 95% confidence interval: 0.26 to 0.78).

 

Conclusion

Increased operator experience is associated with improvement in risk-adjusted in-hospital progress. These results are potentially important for individual training and hospital programs in TAVR.

 

Courtesy of Dr. Carlos Fava.

 

Original title: Individual Operator Experience and Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Reference: Arash Salemi et al. Article in press.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....