Outcomes of Contemporary DES in Patients with Diabetes: Do They Render Freedom Obsolete?

Despite our high hopes for new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), patients with diabetes still have a different prognosis, both clinical and angiographic, compared with non-diabetic patients.

stentAuthors sought to investigate the impact of diabetes on patients who underwent drug-eluting stent implantation in the BIONICS (BioNIR Ridaforolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System in Coronary Stenosis) trial.

 

This 1:1 randomized trial was designed to assess the non-inferiority of ridaforolimus-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents in 1919 patients undergoing angioplasty. There was a protocol pre-specified analysis of outcomes in patients with diabetes at 2 years.


Read also: The Price of Binge Watching: Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Sleep Quality.


The prevalence of diabetes in this population was 29.1%. Diabetic patients had higher body mass index, greater prevalence of dyslipidemia and hypertension, and smaller reference vessel diameter.

 

At one year, the rate of target lesion failure (a combination of cardiac death, target vessel infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization) was significantly higher among diabetic patients (7.8% vs. 4.2%; p = 0.002). This difference was mainly driven by higher revascularization rates (4.5% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.002).


Read also: Anticoagulation Plays a Controversial Role in TAVR.


Among the cohort of diabetic patients undergoing angiographic follow-up, restenosis rates were 3 times higher compared with those of non-diabetic patients (15.2% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.01). Clinical and angiographic outcomes were similar with both stents.

 

Conclusion

Despite advances in new-generation DES, diabetic patients still have worse angiographic and clinical prognosis compared with non-diabetic patients. As suggested by the new European guidelines on myocardial revascularization, diabetes should tilt the scales in favor of surgery in patients with multivessel disease.

 

Original title: Outcomes Among Diabetic Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents. Analysis from the BIONICS Randomized Trial.

Reference: Maayan Konigstein et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2018;11:2467-76.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....