Valve-in-Valve with Self-Expanding Prosthesis: What Happens with Gradients at One Year?

Degenerated surgical bioprostheses can be safely treated with CoreValve or CoreValve Evolut using the valve-in-valve procedure. Excellent 1-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes were achieved in a non-selected regular population, i.e., “real-world” patients.

valve in valve

The VIVA (Valve in Valve) registry, conducted at 23 sites, was a prospective study designed to systematically collect data from patients with degenerated surgical prostheses who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Researchers enrolled a total of 202 patients with degenerated surgical prostheses who were eligible for elective treatment with CoreValve or CoreValve Evolut R.


Read also: Aspirin in Primary Prevention: Another “Trendy” Topic in Publications.


Mean patient age was 79.9 years old and the risk according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score was 6.6%.

Although 41.8% of patients had ≤21-mm surgical bioprostheses, valve hemodynamic parameters markedly improved from baseline (mean baseline valve gradient 35.0 ± 16.3 mmHg vs. 17.5 ± 8.6 mmHg at discharge). At 1 year, aortic regurgitation greater than mild was barely 1.1%.

Clinical events at 30 days demonstrated low mortality (2.5%), no disabling strokes, a 0.5% rate of acute kidney injury, and an 8% rate of permanent pacemaker implantation.

At 1 year, the mortality rate remained low (8.8%), with only 1 disabling stroke during that period (0.6%).


Read also: Pulmonary Hypertension: No Reason for TAVR Contraindication.


About 2.5% of patients (n = 5) experienced coronary artery occlusion as complication (one of the most feared for valve-in-valve); 3 took place during release, 1 immediately after the procedure, and only 1 several months later.

Conclusion

Surgically-implanted valves with bioprosthetic degeneration can be safely treated with the self-expanding device with more evidence in the market, which has excellent 1-year clinical and hemodynamic outcomes in this real-world non-selected population.

Orginal Title: TAVR for Failed Surgical Aortic Bioprostheses Using aSelf-Expanding Device 1-Year Results From the Prospective VIVA Postmarket Study.

Reference: Didier Tchétché et al.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...