Net Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs. Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation

This analysis shows that the long-term clinical benefit of left atrial appendage closure with Watchman is superior to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The initial peri-procedural risks of device implantation are counterbalanced over time, with reduced risk of bleeding and death. 

Resultados a 5 años del cierre de orejuela

The PROTECT-AF (Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology for Embolic Protection in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) and the PREVAIL (Evaluation of the Watchman LAA Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long Term Warfarin Therapy) showed the non-inferiority of left atrial appendage closure vs. warfarin for the combined end point of stroke, systemic embolism and cardiovascular death. The present study aims at quantifying the clinical net benefit of left atrial appendage closure vs. Warfarin. 

To this end, researchers carried out a post hoc analysis of the above-mentioned randomized studies, which included patients from the US and Europe between 2005 and 2012 with paroxysmal, persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation, with CHADS₂ risk score ≥1.


Read also: AHA 2019 | COMPLETE: Complete Revascularization Is Superior since It Treats Other Vulnerable Plaque.


Of the 1114 patients randomized, the clinical net benefit of left atrial appendage closure was 1.42% per year (p=0.04) and relative risk was 0.74 (CI 95%, 0.56 to 1). 

Early in follow up, the clinical net benefit favors warfarin (given the inevitable events of all invasive procedures) but the scales tilt in favor of left atrial appendage closure between the first and second year of follow up. 


Read also: Pre-TAVR Revascularization: Angiographic or Physiological?


The superiority of left atrial appendage closure was observed across all subgroups, but patients with prior stroke and non-diabetic were particularly benefited. 

Conclusion

This long-term analysis shows that in patients with atrial fibrillation, the net clinical benefit of left atrial appendage closure is superior to warfarin. The initial risks are compensated by reduced bleeding and death rates between the first and second year. 

2019-11-26-treat-stroke-to-target

Original Title: Net Clinical Benefit of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pooled Analysis of the Randomized PROTECT-AF and PREVAIL Studies.

Reference: Tom F. Brouwer et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e013525.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Low-Dose Rivaroxaban After Peripheral Angioplasty: Effectiveness and Safety in Real-World Clinical Practice

Following lower limb revascularization, optimal medical therapy includes antiplatelet agents, high-intensity statins, and control of cardiovascular risk factors. Recent studies such as COMPASS and...

How real are the adverse effects of statins? Evidence from randomized clinical trials

The safety of statins continues to be a subject of debate, partly due to the extensive list of adverse effects included in prescribing information,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...