Benefit of Anticoagulation in the Elderly with Atrial Fibrillation

Guidelines recommend oral anticoagulation for all ≥ 75-year-old patients with atrial fibrillation. However, there is little evidence as to its net clinical benefit in the elderly population.

anticoagulated patients that receive angioplasty

This study looked at the life net clinical benefit in atrial fibrillation patients over 75 years of age treated with warfarin or apixaban vs. no treatment.

Researchers observed stroke, bleeding and death rates, and the odds of this happening according to stroke and bleeding risk, and life expectancy of each particular patient. 

The study included 14946 patients of mean 81 years and CHA₂DS₂-VASc score of 4.


Read also: Percutaneous Annuloplasty in Functional Mitral Regurgitation vs. Sham Procedure.


In the main analysis, being over 87 cancelled the clinical benefit of warfarin while apixaban this happened as of 92 years of age. 

A life expectancy over 3 years resulted in higher net clinical benefit too. 

Conclusion

The net clinical benefit of anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation reduces over time. Physicians should consider age and life expectancy when indicating anticoagulation to the elderly. 

2019-12-06-10-1161-CIRCOUTCOMES-119.006212

Original Title: Net Clinical Benefit of Oral Anticoagulation Among Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation.

Reference: Sachin J. Shah et al. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Nov;12(11):e006212.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

AHA 2025 | OPTIMA-AF: 1 Month vs. 12 Months of Dual Therapy (DOAC + P2Y12) After PCI in Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and coronary artery disease is a common occurrence in clinical practice. In these patients, current guidelines recommend 1 month of...

AHA 2025 | OCEAN Study: Anticoagulation vs. Antiplatelet Therapy After Successful Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

After a successful atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the need to maintain long-term anticoagulation (AC) remains uncertain, especially considering the very low residual embolic risk...

AHA 2025 | VESALIUS-CV: Evolocumab in High-Cardiovascular-Risk Patients Without Prior MI or Stroke

LDL cholesterol is a well-established factor for cardiovascular disease. Therapy with PCSK9 inhibitors, including evolocumab, has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular...

AHA 2025 | DAPT-MVD: Extended DAPT vs. Aspirin Monotherapy After PCI in Multivessel Disease

In patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who remain stable 12 months after drug-eluting stent (DES) stenting, there is uncertainty as to prolonging dual...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....