Post TAVR Regression of Ventricular Mass

This study looked at patients with moderate to severe left ventricular hypertrophy and aortic stenosis treated with transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Patients with reduced hypertrophy had lower mortality and fewer hospitalizations at 5 years. 

La revascularización incompleta se asocia a mortalidad en el TAVI

It included all moderate to severe risk patients with ventricular hypertrophy undergoing TAVR in the studies and registries PARTNER (I, II and S3) who had survived one year after procedure.  

The study looked at the link between ventricular mass index regression (percent change between baseline and 1 year) and mortality or rehospitalization at one and five years. 

In 1434 patients with mean ventricular mass index 146 g/m2 at baseline (range 133 to 168 g/m2 ) there was 14.5% regression to mean 126 g/m2 at one year. 

After adjusting for multiple variables, it was found the greater the left ventricular mass index at one year, the lower the mortality rate (HR: 0.95 per 10% regression, p=0.004).


Read also: European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions Position Statement During the Pandemic.


Severe hypertrophy, observed in 39% of patients, was an independent factor of all-cause mortality, with similar association to cardiovascular mortality and rehospitalization. This is why left ventricular mass index regression had an impact on these points. 

Conclusion

Ventricular hypertrophy regression one year after TAVR is associated with reduced mortality and rehospitalization at 5 years. These findings may impact the optimal time for TAVR as well as medical treatment after TAVR. 

Original Title: Regression of Left Ventricular Mass After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement The PARTNER Trials and Registries.

Reference: Katherine H. Chau et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75:2446–58.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....