ESC 2020 | Post PCI Trimetazidine: No Adverse Events or Great Benefits

Trimetazidine in addition to optimal medical therapy in patients undergoing coronary PCI does not change events rate at long term. 

ESC 2020 | Trimetazidina post angioplastia: sin efectos adversos pero sin grandes beneficios

The ATPCI study was presented at ESC 2020 and simultaneously published in the Lancet. This study randomized coronary PCI patients with stable or acute NSTEMI coronary syndromes to trimetazidine vs. placebo.  

What is the rationale behind the use of trimetazidine? Unlike the first and second line drugs most habitually used, trimetazidine is the only one with no hemodynamic effect (it does not affect cardiac rhythm, systolic or diastolic pressure, or pre and afterload).  Trimetazidine improves the metabolism of the ischemic myocardium. 

Despite its interesting action mechanism, researchers, somewhat disappointed, have confirmed the drug does not show benefits at mean 5-year followup. 


Read also: ESC 2020 | Against the Grain, ASA Monotherapy Appears Superior after TAVR.


The ATPCI included 6007 patients (mean age 61) randomized after successful PCI to trimetazidine 35 mg every 12 hrs. vs placebo.

Primary efficacy end point included cardiac death, rehospitalization for cardiac event, recurrent or persistent angina requiring addition or change of dose of at least one antianginal drug, or coronary angiogram. 

After nearly 5 years, primary end point incidence was practically identical between groups (23.3% vs 23.7%; p=0.73). Neither were there differences when looking at components separately. 


Read also: ESC 2020 | New Drug Improves Functional Capacity in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.


The ESC 2019 guidelines had classified trimetazidine (class IIa) as a second line drug in patients with angina. 

ATPCI-full

Original Title: Efficacy and safety of trimetazidine after percutaneous coronary intervention (ATPCI): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Reference: Ferrari R et al. Lancet 2020 Aug 28;S0140-6736(20)31790-6. Presentado en forma virtual en el congreso de la ESC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...