Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

ESC 2020 | Against the Grain, ASA Monotherapy Appears Superior after TAVR

After TAVR, patients with no anticoagulation indication are favored by monotherapy with aspirin (ASA) vs. dual antiaggregation therapy (DAPT). 

La monoterapia de AAS parece superior luego del TAVI

This study presented at ESC 2020, simultaneously published in NEJM, seems to go against the latest “fashion” (P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy) and randomized patients to ASA monotherapy vs. DAPT with clopidogrel for 3 months.

Unlike with the coronaries, the optimal antithrombotic scheme after TAVR is yet to be established. The European guidelines recommend aspirin and clopidogrel immediately after procedure and monotherapy after 3 months, but this information has been extrapolated from old coronary angioplasty studies. 

At the time, there were no randomized studies on antithrombotic therapy after TAVR.


Lea también: ESC 2020 | Atrial Fibrillation and Rhythm Control: A Matter of Time?


The POPular TAVI had two cohorts. In cohort B (patients with anticoagulation indication) had already showed increased bleeding with clopidogrel with no clear benefit against ischemia. 

In patients who had no anticoagulation indication (cohort A) ASA monotherapy resulted safer than DAPT and showed no increase in thrombotic events. 

This information should impact guidelines at short term, since it debunks the idea of DAPT after TAVR. Patients with no indication for anticoagulation should receive aspirin alone, and those with anticoagulation indication should receive anticoagulation alone. 


Lea también: ESC 2020 | New SGLT2 Inhibitor Impacts Heart Failure Mortality.


Cohort A included 665 patients (mean age 80) who did not require anticoagulation, randomized to ASA monotherapy vs. aspirin + clopidogrel (for 3 months) followed by aspirin alone.  Aspirin doses were between 80 and 100 mg, and clopidogrel dose was 75 mg.

All patients were followed up for one year.

Both primary end points favored aspirin in all bleeding (15.1% vs 26.6%, RR 0.57; CI 95% 0.42-0.77) and non-procedure related bleeding (15.1% vs 24.9%, RR 0.61; CI 95% 0.44-0.83).


Lea también: ESC 2020 | Nuevo inhibidor SGLT2 con impacto en la mortalidad por insuficiencia cardíaca.


Combined end points of cardiovascular death, non-procedure related bleeding, stroke or infarction also favored monotherapy with aspirin (23.0% vs 31.1%), reaching both non-inferiority and superiority criteria.

With this evidence, patients will no longer receive clopidogrel after TAVR. 

POPular-tavi-full

Original Title: Aspirin with or without clopidogrel after transcatheter aortic-valve implantation.

Reference: Brouwer J et al. N Engl J Med. 2020; Epub ahead of print y presentado en forma virtual en el congreso ESC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

KISS Trial: provisional stenting in non-left main coronary bifurcations — is less more?

Coronary bifurcation angioplasty remains one of the most frequent and technically challenging scenarios in interventional cardiology. Between 15% and 20% of coronary procedures involve...

Complex radial access: a four-step protocol to overcome loops and tortuosity

Radial access is currently the preferred strategy for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventions due to its lower rates of bleeding and vascular complications...

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...