ESC 2020 | Post PCI Trimetazidine: No Adverse Events or Great Benefits

Trimetazidine in addition to optimal medical therapy in patients undergoing coronary PCI does not change events rate at long term. 

ESC 2020 | Trimetazidina post angioplastia: sin efectos adversos pero sin grandes beneficios

The ATPCI study was presented at ESC 2020 and simultaneously published in the Lancet. This study randomized coronary PCI patients with stable or acute NSTEMI coronary syndromes to trimetazidine vs. placebo.  

What is the rationale behind the use of trimetazidine? Unlike the first and second line drugs most habitually used, trimetazidine is the only one with no hemodynamic effect (it does not affect cardiac rhythm, systolic or diastolic pressure, or pre and afterload).  Trimetazidine improves the metabolism of the ischemic myocardium. 

Despite its interesting action mechanism, researchers, somewhat disappointed, have confirmed the drug does not show benefits at mean 5-year followup. 


Read also: ESC 2020 | Against the Grain, ASA Monotherapy Appears Superior after TAVR.


The ATPCI included 6007 patients (mean age 61) randomized after successful PCI to trimetazidine 35 mg every 12 hrs. vs placebo.

Primary efficacy end point included cardiac death, rehospitalization for cardiac event, recurrent or persistent angina requiring addition or change of dose of at least one antianginal drug, or coronary angiogram. 

After nearly 5 years, primary end point incidence was practically identical between groups (23.3% vs 23.7%; p=0.73). Neither were there differences when looking at components separately. 


Read also: ESC 2020 | New Drug Improves Functional Capacity in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.


The ESC 2019 guidelines had classified trimetazidine (class IIa) as a second line drug in patients with angina. 

Original Title: Efficacy and safety of trimetazidine after percutaneous coronary intervention (ATPCI): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Reference: Ferrari R et al. Lancet 2020 Aug 28;S0140-6736(20)31790-6. Presentado en forma virtual en el congreso de la ESC 2020.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

We are interested in your opinion. Please, leave your comments, thoughts, questions, etc., below. They will be most welcome.

More articles by this author

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...