TCT 2020 | Ticagrelor Monotherapy After ST-Segment Elevation Infarction

Ticagrelor monotherapy after 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients who experienced ST-segment elevation infarction significantly reduces major bleeding without increasing ischemic risk.

This pre-specified analysis of the TICO study shows that ticagrelor monotherapy is safe even in patients with higher ischemic risk.

Interrupting aspirin use after 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy and continuing treatment using only ticagrelor compared with using aspirin plus ticagrelor for a year reduces the risk of major bleeding to less than a third (0.9% vs. 2.9%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.12-0.87).

This advantage did not come at the expense of more ischemic events (2.7% vs. 2.5%; HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.53-2.27).

This strategy has been assessed in other studies, but with different ischemic risk profiles. Only 13% of patients included in GLOBAL LEADERS had ST-segment elevation, while TWILIGHT enrolled none with this criterion.


Read also: TCT 2020 | Crushed Prasugrel Administration prior PCI.


The results of the subgroup of patients with ST-segment elevation in the TICO study mimic the results of the general population.

The TICO study was conducted in 38 sites in South Korea, where patients with acute coronary syndrome (unstable angina, and infarction with and without ST-segment elevation) underwent angioplasty with ultrathin-strut Orsiro stent 12 months into dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus ticagrelor or 3 months of dual antiplatelet therapy followed by 9 months of ticagrelor monotherapy. The protocol included an analysis of the 1103 patients enrolled with ST-segment elevation at baseline.

The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (a composite of TIMI major bleeding, death, infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, and target-vessel revascularization).


Read also: TCT 2020 | Prophylactic Angioplasty for Vulnerable Plaques.


The primary endpoint was similar at the intention-to-treat analysis (3.7% vs. 5.0%), but the difference reached significance in the as-treated analysis in favor of monotherapy (2.3% vs. 5.2%; HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.23-0.86).

Ticagrelor monotherapy reduced TIMI major bleeding regardless of patient bleeding risk at baseline as defined by the PRECISE-DAPT score (p = 0.69 for interaction).

The complexity of angioplasty did not significantly influence the results, but the highest risk of ischemic events was seen, precisely, in patients who underwent complex angioplasty followed by monotherapy.

Original Title: TICO-STEMI: a randomized trial of ticagrelor monotherapy vs. ticagrelor with aspirin in STEMI.

Reference: presentado por Kim B-K en el congreso TCT 2020 virtual.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...