Axillary Access for Microaxial Ventricular Support Device Placement

There is little evidence in support of the axillary access for counterpulsation balloon insertion, but this evidence is null when it comes to microaxial ventricular support device placement (the Impella device family). 

Acceso percutáneo axilar para dispositivos de asistencia ventricular

Clinical indication of short-term mechanical circulatory support devices has been on the rise. Many patients present suboptimal iliofemoral access or early mobilization is required. 

Axillary artery access is an option for these patients, and this is the rationale behind the ARMS Registry (Axillary Access Registry to Monitor Safety) which prospectively included patients to analyze the feasibility and safety of this procedure. 

A total 102 patients from 10 centers were included. Successful device implantation was 98% and support lasted mean 2 days (range 0-35 days). Postprocedural access site hematoma or bleeding was noted in 9 patients. 

Major complications included 10 bleedings and one stroke. Minor complications included 3 patients presenting, after several days, C8 tingling consistent with brachial plexus related symptoms. 


Read also: Intravascular Imaging: A Universal Approach for Angioplasty Optimization.


Device explantation was done with closure devices alone in 61% of cases, stent grafts in 17%, balloon tamponade facilitated closure in 15%, and planned surgical explant in 5%. 

Support duration was independently associated with vascular complications and increased complications by 1.1% per day.

Conclusion

Percutaneous axillary access of microaxial support pumps (Impella family) appears feasible with acceptable rates of bleeding, despite the early experience.

Original Title: Percutaneous Axillary Access for Placement of Microaxial Ventricular Support Devices. The Axillary Access Registry to Monitor Safety (ARMS).

Reference: James M. McCabe et al. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:e009657. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009657.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Intravascular Imaging-Guided PCI vs. Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated superior outcomes with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with left main...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

COILSEAL: Use of Coils in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Useful for Complication Management?

The use of coils as vascular closing tool has been steadily expanding beyond its traditional role in neuroradiology into coronary territory, where it remains...

Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Small Vessels with Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons

Coronary artery disease (CAD) in smaller epicardial vessels occurs in 30% to 67% of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and poses particular technical challenges....

Contemporary Challenges in Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Updated Approach to Device Embolization

Even though percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is generally safe, device embolization – with 0 to 1.5% global incidence – is still a...