IVUS vs iFR for Left Main Decision Making

No decision on the coronary tree has more impact than left main intervention. This makes interventionists prone to over and underestimation of angiographic imaging. In other words, in real life we never report on angiograms showing moderate left main lesions.  

IVUS vs OCT para guiar la angioplastia ¿Cuál elegir?

This reality should be looked into, since operating or intervening moderate left main lesions on a suspicious angiographic imaging doesn’t come free. 

Interobserver variability was created when intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) started being published. The 6 mm2 minimal luminal cutoff area by IVUS resulted effective for revascularization decision making. 

These studies offered an objective solution, but also raised a few questions. The cutoff value is an absolute number that does not take into account vessel reference diameter, or patient body surface area. A small woman can have < 6 mm2 luminal area in a perfectly healthy left main. 

These were  the questions  behind the present study, published in Circulation, to assess the use of iFR in the assessment of angiographically intermediate left main lesions.

It included 125 patients assessed with iFR and IVUS. Researchers identified iFR ≤0.89 correlates well with minimal luminal area < 6 mm2. This cutoff value has and area under the curve of 0.77 (77% sensitivity and 66% specificity; p<0.0001).

69 patients with no anterior descending or circumflex ostial lesions showed and area under the curve of 0.84 (70% sensitivity and 84% specificity; p<0.0001).


Read also: Which Type 2 Endoleaks Should We Intervene?


This correlation was not influenced when considering patient body surface. 

This is a good correlation; however, it does not seem enough for a left main lesion. Besides, IVUS not only is useful for diagnosing, but also for strategy planning and angiogram outcome optimization. 

It the therapeutic decision were myocardial revascularization and there were other lesions to assess, we might be tempted to use iFR. However, there is evidence showing lesion functional assessment is not useful when it comes to surgical revascularization. 

Conclusion

Instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) ≤0.89 correlated well with minimal luminal area < 6 mm2 by intravascular ultrasound imaging (IVUS)in intermediate left main lesions. This was true regardless patient body surface. 

Original Title: Correlation of Intravascular Ultrasound and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Patients With Intermediate Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

Reference: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jun;14(6):e009830. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009830.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 – ECLIPSE: Randomized Study of Orbital Atherectomy vs Conventional PCI in Severely Calcified Lesions

Coronary calcification is associated with stent under-expansion and increased risk of both early and late adverse events. Atherectomy is an essential tool for uncrossable...

TCT 2024 | Use of Drug-Coated Balloons for Side Branch Treatment in Provisional Stenting

In some cases, treating coronary bifurcations with provisional stenting requires side branch stenting, which may lead to suboptimal outcomes. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) have emerged...

TCT 2024 | Use of Artificial Intelligence for Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease

The current approach to chest pain mainly focuses on symptom characteristics, conducting functional tests for ischemia assessment. However, several randomized clinical trials have shown...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TCT 2024 | FAVOR III EUROPA

The study FAVOR III EUROPA, a randomized trial, included 2,000 patients with chronic coronary syndrome, or stabilized acute coronary syndrome, and intermediate lesions. 1,008...

TCT 2024 | TRISCEND II

This randomized study included 400 patients; 267 were treated with EVOQUE valve and 133 with optimal medical treatment (OMT). After one-year follow-up, there were no...

TCT 2024 – ACCESS-TAVI: Comparing Percutaneous Access Closure Strategies After TAVI

Vascular access complications following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remain common. However, few studies compare vascular access closure methods.  Based on the CHOICE-CLOSURE and MASH...