TICO: Age Impacts the Effect of Antiplatelet Monotherapy

The higher the age, the greater the benefit of ticagrelor monotherapy vs. dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Fentanilo en la angioplatia: ¿Cuál es el precio de un mayor confort en el procedimiento?

This post hoc sub-analysis of the TICO study goes along the same lines as the TWILIGHT study (which we recently discussed), given that age is the most common reason for considering that a patient is at high risk of bleeding. 

The analysis sought to find an age-dependent effect in patients who received 3 months of DAPT and then were randomized to ticagrelor monotherapy vs. completing 12 months of DAPT.

To answer this question, TICO included 3056 patients (mean age 61 years) and defined as primary endpoint a composite of major bleeding, death, infarction, stent thrombosis, stroke, or target-vessel revascularization.

The effect on bleeding reduction increased gradually with age, peaking at 64 years.


Read also: Post-PCI Ticagrelor Monotherapy in High-Risk Bleeding.


Considering 64 years as the cutoff point, the occurrence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower with ticagrelor monotherapy compared with patients who completed one year of DAPT (4.4% vs 9.0%; p = 0.002). In younger patients (n=1778), the difference between the two strategies was not significant.

Conclusion

There is an age-dependent effect that increases the benefit of ticagrelor monotherapy (after 3 months of DAPT) vs. completing a year of DAPT in patients admitted with acute coronary syndrome. Discontinuing aspirin at 3 months is superior in the elderly compared with younger patients, for whom the difference between strategies is not significant.

JAHA-121-022700

Original Title: Age-Dependent Effect of Ticagrelor Monotherapy Versus Ticagrelor With Aspirin on Major Bleeding and Cardiovascular Events: A Post Hoc Analysis of the TICO Randomized Trial. 

Reference: Byung Gyu Kim et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 21;10(24):e022700. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022700.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

Dynamic Coronary Roadmap: does it really help reduce contrast use?

Contrast-induced nephropathy remains a relevant complication of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), particularly in patients with multiple comorbidities and complex coronary anatomies. Dynamic Coronary Roadmap...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...