Symptomatic Carotid Arteries: Early or Late Emergency Revascularization?

Carotid endarterectomy continues to be the safest technique for emergency revascularization. However, 48 hours after index event, different strategy outcomes will become comparable. 

Carótidas sintomáticas: ¿revascularización urgente, precoz o retardada?

Multiple advances in device development have brought promising results for carotid revascularization patients with symptomatic stenosis. Regardless these developments, optimal revascularization timing after index event remains unclear

This study included patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR), transfemoral carotid stenting (TFCAS), or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) at different times after index event. 

Procedures were regarded as urgent (0 to 2 days after last event), early (3 to 14 days) or late (15 to 180 days).

Primary end point was inhospital death or stroke. Secondary end point added transient ischemic event. 

The study included 18,643 symptomatic revascularizations: 10.8% were urgent, 39.8% were early, and the remaining half was late.


Read also:  TICO: Age Impacts the Effect of Antiplatelet Monotherapy.


Patients undergoing TFCAS showed the highest rate of stroke and death at all timing cohorts. 

Among urgent cases, CAE had 4% events vs 6.9% for TFCAS and 6.5% for TCAR (p=0.018). These differences tended to level off the later patients were treated. 

When adjusting for risk, OR resulted similar between patients undergoing CAE and TCAR. 

Conclusion

CAE continues to be the safest revascularization approach for emergency cases. TCAR and CAE seem similar after 48 hours. 

Original Title: In-Hospital Outcomes of Urgent, Early, or Late Revascularization for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Reference: Christina L. Cui et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Dec 21;10(24):e022700. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022700.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is abdominal aortic aneurysm screening cost-effective in women?

Although ultrasound screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a well-established strategy in men over 65 years of age, its value in women remains...

Aneurysm Sac Regression Predicts Better Clinical Outcomes After EVAR?

Aneurysm sac regression following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been proposed as a marker of favorable remodeling and effective aneurysm exclusion. However,...

SPYRAL Program: 3-Year Outcomes in Patients Treated with Renal Denervation

Hypertension is the leading modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and remains a major global health challenge, affecting more than one billion adults worldwide.  Despite...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...