Acute Coronary Syndrome: What Is Safer, Antiaggregant Monotherapy or De-Escalation?

For several years it has been shown that 12-month dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is mandatory for patients undergoing left main PCI for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, though this strategy does reduce thrombotic events and mortality, it also causes undesirable bleeding events followed by hospitalization and antiaggregation interruption for a period of time. 

Síndromes coronarios agudos: ¿Qué es más seguro: monoterapia con antiagregante o De-Escalation?

A feasible strategy could be to interrupt one of the antiaggregants (be it aspirin -ASA- or P2Y12 inhibitor). The alternative could be to switch (De-Escalation) to a P2Y12 inhibitor of lower antiaggregation power (for example from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel) or to reduce dosage.

This question remains unanswered.

This meta-analysis included 29 studies with 50602 patients, and it compared short duration antiaggregation (SHORT DAPT) vs. de-escalation.

Mean age was 63, there was an important number of women and a percentage of diabetics that ranged between 22% and 26%. There were no differences in all-cause mortality. 

De-escalation reduced the risk of net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) (RR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.70-0.94) but increased the risk of major bleeding (RR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.07-2.21).

Read also: IVUS in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A New Requirement?

De-Escalation showed >95% probability to prevent NACE, MI, stroke, stent-thrombosis, and minor bleeding. However, it showed a very high rate of major bleeding. 

On the other hand, the SHORT DAPT approach showed better performance (>95%) in the prevention of major bleeding.

Conclusion

In patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI there were no differences in all-cause mortality between SHORT DAPT and De-Escalation. De-Escalation reduced NACE risk, while SHORT DAPT reduced the risk of major bleeding. 

These data characterize 2 contemporary strategies to personalize the use of DAPT according to treatment goals and risk profile.

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the SOLACI.org Editorial Board. 

Original Title: Short Duration of DAPT Versus De-Escalation After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Reference: Claudio Laudani, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022;15:268–277.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...