OCT in STEMI Patients: Is It Safe to Prevent Stenting?

Percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) where the physiopathological mechanism is plaque erosion or non-atherosclerotic mechanisms (such as spontaneous coronary artery dissection) is not beneficial according to recent studies. 

OCT en pacientes con SCACEST, ¿Es seguro utilizarlo para evitar implante de stent?

The EROSION study (Effective Anti-Thrombotic Therapy Without Stenting: Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography–Based Management in Plaque Erosion) has shown medical treatment with no stenting might be an option to treat plaque erosion driven AMI. To assess the etiological differences generated by a coronary event using optical coherence tomography (OCT) is ideal.

The aim of this multicenter, prospective, randomized study in STEMI patients followed up at one year, was to examine whether OCT guided revascularization is associated with lower stenting rate vs. conventional angiography guided revascularization. 

Primary effectiveness end point was stent implantation rate in both groups. Safety end point was incidence of the composite of cardiovascular death, repeat MI, target vessel revascularization and unstable angina. Secondary end point included the incidence of cerebro and cardiovascular events at 1 year. 

226 patients were included, 112 in the OCT group and 114 in the angiography group. Mean age was 55, mostly were men. Culprit lesion was most frequently located in the anterior descending (49%) and right coronary arteries (40%).

Read also: RESTORE | Using Rivaroxaban to Prevent Radial Artery Occlusion After an Intervention.

Total stent implantation rate was 51%, OCT presenting the lowest rate compared against the angiography group (43.8% vs 58.8%; P = 0.024). there were no significant differences in secondary end point. 

Conclusion

In STEMI patients with early infarct artery patency with no significative stenosis compared against the angiography guided group, OCT reduced stent implantation rate.  Further study is required to determine the clinical benefits of OCT guided reperfusion.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board in SOLACI.org .

Original Title: EROSION III A Multicenter RCT of OCT-Guided Reperfusion in STEMI With Early Infarct Artery Patency.

Reference: Haibo Jia, MD, PHD et al. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2022.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

iFR- vs. FFR-Guided Coronary Revascularization: 5-Year Clinical Outcomes

The assessment of coronary stenosis using coronary physiology has become a key tool in guiding revascularization. The two most widely used techniques are fractional...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...