Safety of Acetylcholine in the Cath Lab

The concepts of ischemia with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) and myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA) have been established, widely spread, accepted, and included in the different guidelines that support our clinical practice. Among INOCA and MINOCA we find vasospastic angina (VSA) caused by epicardial vessel spasms and angina caused by microvascular spasm (MVS), both described as syndrome etiology.

To establish the cause of MINOCA, coronary provocation testing with intracoronary acetylcholine is considered a IIA indication. Specific treatments for these cases might improve patient quality of life, since they often relapse. However, at present, physicians fear potential complications. 

The aim of this study was to assess, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the safety of coronary provocation testing with intracoronary acetylcholine (ACh) for the contemporary diagnosis of epicardial and microvascular spasm. Major complication was defined as a composite of death, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, myocardial infarction, or shock requiring reanimation. Minor complications were paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, ventricular extrasystole, transient hypotension or bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation. 

This meta-analysis included a total of 16 studies with 12585 patients, the administration of 100 to 200mcg acetylcholine to the left coronary and the assessment of endothelial function with a short 36mcg infusion.

Read also: Prognostic Value of Structural and Functional Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients with Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease.

Major complications incidence was 0.5% (CI 95% 0.0-1.3%). There were no deaths. Subgroup analysis showed accumulated incidence of major complications was higher in studies where spasm cutoff value was ≥90% obstruction vs. prior diagnostic cutoff value of ≥75% (1.0%; CI 95% 0.3-2.0%); the incidence was significantly lower in western populations vs. Asian (0.0%; CI 95% 0.0%-0.45%).

When comparing the safety of different doses, major and minor complications rates were similar when using different acetylcholine doses ranging 100 to 200mcg.

Conclusions

Provocation testing with intracoronary acetylcholine resulted safe. There were differences in subgroups, western populations being the least affected. 

Despite the fact that this meta-analysis showed great study heterogeneity, it shows promise towards advancing acetylcholine routine protocols in the cath lab, to better diagnose VSA and MVS as causes of INOCA and MINOCA. 

Dr. Omar Tupayachi

Dr. Omar Tupayachi.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Safety of Provocative Testing With Intracoronary Acetylcholine and Implications for Standard Protocols.

Reference: Takahashi, Tatsunori et al. “Safety of Provocative Testing With Intracoronary Acetylcholine and Implications for Standard Protocols.” Journal of the American College of Cardiology vol. 79,24 (2022): 2367-2378. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2022.03.385.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...

Radial Patency in Coronary Procedures: Is Heparin Enough or Should We Aim for Distal Transradial Access?

Transradial access is the preferred route in most coronary procedures due to its proven reduction in mortality compared to transfemoral access. However, one of...

SMART-CHOICE 3 | Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel vs Aspirin Monotherapy in High Risk Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Courtesy of Dr. Juan Manuel Pérez. After post percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) standard duration dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), the optimal long term monotherapy strategy is...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...