Is Rehospitalization a Relevant Factor after Aortic Valve Replacement?

Patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis treated with aortic valve replacement might still present cardiac failure, even after successful procedures.  

¿Es la rehospitalización un factor importante luego del reemplazo de válvula aórtica? 

According to some reports, the incidence of cardiac failure after TAVR varies between 9% and 24%. The prognostic relevance of rehospitalization in these patients has not been studied yet; in fact, it remains unclear whether these transient events are important markers when looking to identify patients at higher risk of worse long-term evolution. 

The aim of this substudy of the PARTNER I, II and III trials was to assess the risk of rehospitalization after aortic valve replacement and its link to mortality and health status, assessed with a questionnaire. 

Primary analysis was hospitalization for cardiac failure at one year after procedure and its link to mortality, poor prognosis at followup and health status. Secondary analysis was prognostic link of hospitalization due to the combination of cardiac failure, valve related or procedure related complications. 

It included 3403 patients, 1395 received surgical valve replacement (SAVR) and 2008 transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR). Most patients were categorized as intermediate risk (49.1%) followed by low risk (27.8%). At 1 year, 86% of patients were alive, with no cardiac failure (CF), 5.4% were alive with CF and 8.5% had died. 

Read also: Is it Possible to Reduce DAPT Time in Diabetic Patients?

The accumulated incidence of CF 1 year after procedure was 6.7%, and the accumulated incidence of rehospitalization after a composite of CF for valve related or procedure related cause was 9.7% at 1 year. 

Hospitalization for CF within a year after procedure was an independent factor associated to increased mortality (HR: 3.97; 2.48-6.36, P<0.001), bad prognosis at followup (OR: 2.76; 1.73-4.40, P<0.001) and worse health status (P<0.001) regardless the type of treatment (SAVR or TAVR). 

Conclusion

Based on data from the PARTNER studies, hospitalization for CF and rehospitalization for valve related or procedure related CF are associated to bad prognosis and worse health status, regardless the therapeutic strategy. 

Rehospitalization should be considered and event in the analysis of clinical trials on different treatments to the aortic valve. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Rehospitalization Events After Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER Trial.

Reference: Chetan P. Huded et al Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:e012195.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Transapical TMVR in High Risk Patients: Intrepid 5-Year Outcomes

Moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) continues is still a high prevalence condition with bad prognosis, particularly among the elderly with left ventricular...

Impact of Balloon Post-Dilation on the Long-Term Durability of Bioprostheses after TAVR

Balloon post-dilation (BPD) during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) allows for the optimization of prosthesis expansion and the reduction of residual paravalvular aortic regurgitation....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...