Is Rehospitalization a Relevant Factor after Aortic Valve Replacement?

Patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis treated with aortic valve replacement might still present cardiac failure, even after successful procedures.  

¿Es la rehospitalización un factor importante luego del reemplazo de válvula aórtica? 

According to some reports, the incidence of cardiac failure after TAVR varies between 9% and 24%. The prognostic relevance of rehospitalization in these patients has not been studied yet; in fact, it remains unclear whether these transient events are important markers when looking to identify patients at higher risk of worse long-term evolution. 

The aim of this substudy of the PARTNER I, II and III trials was to assess the risk of rehospitalization after aortic valve replacement and its link to mortality and health status, assessed with a questionnaire. 

Primary analysis was hospitalization for cardiac failure at one year after procedure and its link to mortality, poor prognosis at followup and health status. Secondary analysis was prognostic link of hospitalization due to the combination of cardiac failure, valve related or procedure related complications. 

It included 3403 patients, 1395 received surgical valve replacement (SAVR) and 2008 transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR). Most patients were categorized as intermediate risk (49.1%) followed by low risk (27.8%). At 1 year, 86% of patients were alive, with no cardiac failure (CF), 5.4% were alive with CF and 8.5% had died. 

Read also: Is it Possible to Reduce DAPT Time in Diabetic Patients?

The accumulated incidence of CF 1 year after procedure was 6.7%, and the accumulated incidence of rehospitalization after a composite of CF for valve related or procedure related cause was 9.7% at 1 year. 

Hospitalization for CF within a year after procedure was an independent factor associated to increased mortality (HR: 3.97; 2.48-6.36, P<0.001), bad prognosis at followup (OR: 2.76; 1.73-4.40, P<0.001) and worse health status (P<0.001) regardless the type of treatment (SAVR or TAVR). 

Conclusion

Based on data from the PARTNER studies, hospitalization for CF and rehospitalization for valve related or procedure related CF are associated to bad prognosis and worse health status, regardless the therapeutic strategy. 

Rehospitalization should be considered and event in the analysis of clinical trials on different treatments to the aortic valve. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Rehospitalization Events After Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER Trial.

Reference: Chetan P. Huded et al Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:e012195.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Hemodynamic Outcomes of Edge-to-Edge Repair in Degenerative and Functional Mitral Regurgitation

Transcatheter edge-to-edge mitral valve repair (M-TEER) has become an established therapeutic option for mitral valve disease. Among the available techniques, M-TEER using the MitraClip...

SAPIEN 3 TAVI Durability: Ten-Year Follow-Up in Intermediate-Risk Patients

The durability of transcatheter bioprosthetic valves used in TAVI remains one of the key unanswered questions as indications continue to expand toward patients with...

Inflammation after TAVI: An Emerging Therapeutic Target?

Conduction disturbances and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation remain common complications following TAVI, with an incidence approaching 15%. Although they have traditionally been...

Coronary Obstruction During TAVI: A New Volumetric Index to Consider

Coronary obstruction during TAVI is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic complication, particularly in valve-in-valve procedures, in anatomies with small sinuses of Valsalva, low coronary...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Supera vs. Eluvia at 3 Years in Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Lesions

Severe calcification remains one of the main predictors of restenosis and the need for repeat revascularization following endovascular treatment of femoropopliteal disease. In this...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...