Modelos europeos de telemedicina, como el servicio finlandés Medilux, permiten realizar consultas médicas online mediante un cuestionario clínico, sin acudir a una consulta presencial.

Is Rehospitalization a Relevant Factor after Aortic Valve Replacement?

Patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis treated with aortic valve replacement might still present cardiac failure, even after successful procedures.  

¿Es la rehospitalización un factor importante luego del reemplazo de válvula aórtica? 

According to some reports, the incidence of cardiac failure after TAVR varies between 9% and 24%. The prognostic relevance of rehospitalization in these patients has not been studied yet; in fact, it remains unclear whether these transient events are important markers when looking to identify patients at higher risk of worse long-term evolution. 

The aim of this substudy of the PARTNER I, II and III trials was to assess the risk of rehospitalization after aortic valve replacement and its link to mortality and health status, assessed with a questionnaire. 

Primary analysis was hospitalization for cardiac failure at one year after procedure and its link to mortality, poor prognosis at followup and health status. Secondary analysis was prognostic link of hospitalization due to the combination of cardiac failure, valve related or procedure related complications. 

It included 3403 patients, 1395 received surgical valve replacement (SAVR) and 2008 transcatheter valve replacement (TAVR). Most patients were categorized as intermediate risk (49.1%) followed by low risk (27.8%). At 1 year, 86% of patients were alive, with no cardiac failure (CF), 5.4% were alive with CF and 8.5% had died. 

Read also: Is it Possible to Reduce DAPT Time in Diabetic Patients?

The accumulated incidence of CF 1 year after procedure was 6.7%, and the accumulated incidence of rehospitalization after a composite of CF for valve related or procedure related cause was 9.7% at 1 year. 

Hospitalization for CF within a year after procedure was an independent factor associated to increased mortality (HR: 3.97; 2.48-6.36, P<0.001), bad prognosis at followup (OR: 2.76; 1.73-4.40, P<0.001) and worse health status (P<0.001) regardless the type of treatment (SAVR or TAVR). 

Conclusion

Based on data from the PARTNER studies, hospitalization for CF and rehospitalization for valve related or procedure related CF are associated to bad prognosis and worse health status, regardless the therapeutic strategy. 

Rehospitalization should be considered and event in the analysis of clinical trials on different treatments to the aortic valve. 

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the editorial board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Rehospitalization Events After Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the PARTNER Trial.

Reference: Chetan P. Huded et al Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:e012195.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...

Beyond TAVI: Cardiac Rehabilitation as a Determinant of Clinical Outcomes

Aortic stenosis is an increasingly prevalent condition associated with population aging, with a prevalence of approximately 3.4% in individuals over 75 years of age...

Comparative outcomes between transaxillary approach and thoracotomy-based approaches in TAVI with alternative access

TAVI has become the standard treatment for high-risk aortic stenosis. When transfemoral access is not feasible (approximately 10–15%), alternative approaches are used: transaxillary (subclavian...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks in high-risk patients: clinical outcomes and the impact of residual leak

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is a relatively frequent complication following valve replacement (overall incidence 5–18%; 2–10% in the aortic position and 7–17% in the mitral...

SCAI 2026 | Deep vein arterialization as an alternative in patients with critical limb ischemia without conventional options

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents one of the most advanced stages of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). In a significant proportion of patients, distal anatomy,...

SCAI 2026 | Can an atrial fixation device prevent complications of transcatheter mitral valve replacement? Analysis of the AltaValve system

Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) represents one of the most complex areas within structural interventions. Unlike TAVI, where valvular anatomy typically provides more predictable...