Evolute Low Risk at 3 Years: Promising Outcomes

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement has shown important benefits but one of its biggest challenges is showing its safety and efficacy at followup in low risk patients. At present we have 2-year data from the Evolute Low Risk, but the we lack information at longer followup. 

TAVI bajo riesgo

The study looked at 3-year followup of the Evolute Low Risk including 1414 patients, with 730 receiving TAVR (51.6%) and 630 surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR, 48.4%). 

Primary end point was all cause death or disabling stroke at 3 years.

There were no differences between the populations: mean age was 73, 65% were men, 30% presented diabetes, 85% hypertension, 16% COPD, 8% peripheral vascular disease, 2% prior CABG, 14% prior PCI, 5% prior AMI, 15% atrial fibrillation, 3.5% definite pacemaker implantation. Ejection fraction was 61%.

Mortality STS was 2% and SYNTAX I was 2.

Primary end point for TAVR and SABR resulted 7.4% vs. 10.4% (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.49-1.00; log-rank P=0.051) respectively.

Read also: CLOUT Registry: Thrombectomy in TVP with ClotTriever.

At 3 years, there were no differences between TAVR and SAVR in mortality (6.3% vs. 8.3% HR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.51-1.12; P=0.16) and disabling stroke (2.3% vs. 3.4% HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.34-1.24; P=0.19) 

The combined end point of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke and valve related rehospitalization was 13,2% for TAVR vs. 16.2% for SAVR (HR: 0.76; 95% CI: 0.58-1.00; P=0.050).

Atrial fibrillation rate was higher in patients receiving SAVR (13% vs. 40%, p<0.01) and the need for definite pacemaker was higher among TAVR patients (23.2% vs. 9.1% p<0.01).

Moderate prosthetic mismatch was lower among TAVR patients (10.6 vs. 25.5, p=0.01).

Read also: Retrograde Tibial Access for Endovascular Treatment of Femoropopliteal Occlusions: Is it a Safe Strategy?

There were no differences between the groups when it came to moderate or severe leaks, but TAVR showed more mild leaks. 

There were no differences in AMI, major vascular complications, valve thrombosis or endocarditis. 

Conclusion

At 3 years, the Evolute Low Risk showed the benefits of TAVR are durable as regards all-cause mortality or disabling stroke vs. SAVR. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: 3-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis. 

Reference: John K. Forrest , et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;81:1663–1674. 


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

VECTOR: First Percutaneous Aorto-Coronary Bypass Case, a New Conceptual Approach

Coronary obstruction represents one of the most severe complications associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation, particularly in valve-in-valve scenarios involving surgical bioprostheses, narrow aortic...

Is it safe to use negative chronotropic drugs early after TAVI?

TAVI is associated with a relevant incidence of conduction system disturbances and the development of atrioventricular block that may require permanent pacemaker implantation. Many...

Transapical TMVR in High Risk Patients: Intrepid 5-Year Outcomes

Moderate to severe mitral valve regurgitation (MR) continues is still a high prevalence condition with bad prognosis, particularly among the elderly with left ventricular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

TEER plus optimal medical therapy versus medical therapy alone in functional mitral regurgitation

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a highly prevalent valvular heart disease that, in advanced stages and when left untreated, is associated with reduced quality of...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...