Benefit of Cusp overlap method for self‐expanding transcatheter aortic valves

The need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM) continues to be one of the main challenges in TAVR, especially with self-expanding valves, with a pacemaker implantation rate that varies between 17.5% and 30% in large randomized studies, vs. 4% to 6.5% with self-expanding valves.

Beneficio del implante alto de las válvulas aórticas percutáneas autoexpandibles 

Therefore, in an attempt to prevent the need for PPM implantation, the cusp overlapping technique has been developed (COT) which several analysts have shown has a lower rate vs the conventional implantation technique also called three cusp technique (3C). However, at present, this technique still calls for robust, large randomized trials. 

This study looked at 647 patients undergoing TAVR with self-expanding EVOLUT; 519 (80.2%) with the COT technique.

Both groups were similar, with mean age 82, but surgical scores were higher in those treated with the 3C technique. 

Left ventricular function was higher in COT patients (58% vs. 53%, p<0.001), with 41 mmHg gradient and close to 2% bicuspid valves. 

Read also: Does Post-Dilation in TAVR Affect its Long-Term Outcomes?

Valve 29 was the most used (45%), followed by the 26 (35%), and 34 (12%) and, in lower numbers, the 23; the transfemoral approach was used in nearly all patients.

At 30 days, patients treated with the COT technique showed lower need for PPM implantation (10% vs. 21%, p=<0.001) and one new AV block (11% vs. 23%, p<0.001), with no difference in new intraventricular conduction block. 

Conclusion

COT presents some potential technical advantages vs. 3C, and perhaps a lower rate of PPM implantation in TAVR with self-expanding EVOLUT. 

Dr. Carlos Fava - Consejo Editorial SOLACI

Dr. Carlos Fava.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Cusp overlap method for self‐expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Reference: Talal F. Aljabbary, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;103:202–208.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Transradial Aortic Valvuloplasty: Is Minimalism Worth It?

Balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has historically been used either as a bridge strategy, an assessment tool, or even palliative treatment in severe aortic stenosis...

Atrial Fibrillation After Percutaneous Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Cohort Study with Continuous Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a recognized complication following percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), with reported incidences of up to 30% during...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Coronary Perforations and Use of Covered Stents: Safe and Effective Long-Term Strategy?

Coronary perforations remain one of the most serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), especially in cases of Ellis ruptures type III. In these...

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....

Is it really necessary to monitor all patients after TAVR?

Conduction disorders (CD) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a frequent complication and may lead to the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI)....