Biolimus vs Paclitaxel Coated Balloons for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis

Drug eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) is currently a challenging, seeing as it often requires repeat revascularization. The use of drug coated balloons (DCB) offers the advantage of delivering the drug without the need for re-stenting. This highlights the importance of the technological development of DCB, with diverse drug formulations and coating technologies. As regards DES, prior studies have shown the benefits of limus derivatives over paclitaxel. However, there are no data on whether these benefits transfer to DCBs.

angioplastia de la arteria femoral común

The aim of this multicenter, prospective, randomize, non-inferiority study was to look into biolimus coated balloons (BCB) for the treatment of DES ISR vs paclitaxel coated balloons (PCB).  

The primary outcome was in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) at 9 months after index procedure. Secondary end points included device success, lesion success, clinical success (defined as absence of death, AMI, target vessel revascularization (TVR)), restenosis rate, target vessel failure (TVF), defined as cardiac death, target vessel MI, clinically driven TVR, and stent thrombosis. 

Read also: 2 Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement with Intrepid.

280 patients were included, randomized into 2 groups: BCB (N=140) and PCB (N=140). Mean patient age was 64, and they were mostly men. There were no differences between groups as regards demographic and clinical data, or lesion characteristics. After 9 months, LLL rate for BCB patients was 0.23 ± 0.37mm vs 0.25 ± 0.35mm for PCB, with mean difference between groups of -0.02 (CI: −0.12 – 0.07) mm; p for non-inferiority <0.0001. At 12-month follow-up, there were no differences in clinical results between the groups. 

Conclusion

This randomized study has confirmed that the new BCB for DES ISR is safe and effective, showing non inferiority at 9 months in LLL rate, with no clinical events such as AMI or stent thrombosis at 12 months. These outcomes suggest the potential use of BCB for DES in-stent restenosis.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Biolimus-coated versus paclitaxel-coated balloons for coronary in-stent restenosis (BIO ASCEND ISR): a randomised, non-inferiority trial.

Reference: Yundai Chen MD et al EuroIntervention 2024;20:e806-e817.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

CRT 2026 | CUT-DRESS Trial: Lesion Preparation with Cutting Balloon

In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to represent a relevant clinical challenge in contemporary coronary angioplasty practice. Despite advances in drug-eluting stents, neointimal hyperplasia and suboptimal...

CRT 2026 | Clopidogrel vs Aspirin as Long-Term Monotherapy After Coronary Angioplasty

The use of aspirin as chronic antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has historically been the standard recommended by international guidelines. However, recent...

Bioresorbable devices vs DES in patients at high risk of restenosis. Seven-year follow-up of the COMPARE-ABSORB trial

Studies with second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have shown that the rate of target lesion failure (TLF) increases linearly up to 5–10 years of follow-up,...

Sheathless Femoral Impella: A New Strategy to Reduce Vascular Complications in High-Risk PCI?

Patients with complex coronary artery disease or cardiogenic shock undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may benefit from the hemodynamic support provided by percutaneous ventricular...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

CRT 2026 | NAVITOR IDE: Hemodynamic Outcomes and 5-Year Durability of an Intra-Annular Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve

As TAVI expands into younger populations and patients with lower surgical risk, prosthesis durability has become a key aspect of long-term management. The NAVITOR...