Biolimus vs Paclitaxel Coated Balloons for the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis

Drug eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) is currently a challenging, seeing as it often requires repeat revascularization. The use of drug coated balloons (DCB) offers the advantage of delivering the drug without the need for re-stenting. This highlights the importance of the technological development of DCB, with diverse drug formulations and coating technologies. As regards DES, prior studies have shown the benefits of limus derivatives over paclitaxel. However, there are no data on whether these benefits transfer to DCBs.

angioplastia de la arteria femoral común

The aim of this multicenter, prospective, randomize, non-inferiority study was to look into biolimus coated balloons (BCB) for the treatment of DES ISR vs paclitaxel coated balloons (PCB).  

The primary outcome was in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) at 9 months after index procedure. Secondary end points included device success, lesion success, clinical success (defined as absence of death, AMI, target vessel revascularization (TVR)), restenosis rate, target vessel failure (TVF), defined as cardiac death, target vessel MI, clinically driven TVR, and stent thrombosis. 

Read also: 2 Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement with Intrepid.

280 patients were included, randomized into 2 groups: BCB (N=140) and PCB (N=140). Mean patient age was 64, and they were mostly men. There were no differences between groups as regards demographic and clinical data, or lesion characteristics. After 9 months, LLL rate for BCB patients was 0.23 ± 0.37mm vs 0.25 ± 0.35mm for PCB, with mean difference between groups of -0.02 (CI: −0.12 – 0.07) mm; p for non-inferiority <0.0001. At 12-month follow-up, there were no differences in clinical results between the groups. 

Conclusion

This randomized study has confirmed that the new BCB for DES ISR is safe and effective, showing non inferiority at 9 months in LLL rate, with no clinical events such as AMI or stent thrombosis at 12 months. These outcomes suggest the potential use of BCB for DES in-stent restenosis.

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez.
Member of the Editorial Board of SOLACI.org.

Original Title: Biolimus-coated versus paclitaxel-coated balloons for coronary in-stent restenosis (BIO ASCEND ISR): a randomised, non-inferiority trial.

Reference: Yundai Chen MD et al EuroIntervention 2024;20:e806-e817.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

More articles by this author

DAPT ≤30 Days After Drug-Coated Balloon Coronary Angioplasty

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) coronary angioplasty without stent implantation has become a well-established alternative in several clinical scenarios, particularly in patients at high bleeding risk...

Is IVUS Always Necessary for Left Main Coronary Artery PCI?

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the unprotected left main coronary artery is a highly complex procedure because of the large amount of myocardium at...

Dual-Prep Registry: Atherectomy and IVL for Severe Coronary Calcification

Severe coronary calcification remains one of the most challenging scenarios in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although rotational or orbital atherectomy and intravascular lithotripsy (IVL)...

Prehospital heparin in STEMI: A safe strategy associated with improved early reperfusion

Early reperfusion remains the main prognostic determinant in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

SAFE-PROTECT at 12 Months: AnchorMan vs. Watchman for Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) closure is an alternative therapeutic strategy for reducing the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Randomized...

Clinical and haemodynamic outcomes with contemporary intra- vs. supra-annular valves: The HERA-TAVI Registry

According to the latest European guidelines, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the recommended treatment for patients aged ≥70 years with symptomatic severe aortic...

Redo-TAVI with SAPIEN 3: 30-Day Outcomes

The indications for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) have rapidly expanded to include intermediate- and low-risk patients, extending its use to younger individuals with...