ACC 2025 | BHF PROTECT-TAVI: Are Cerebral Protection Systems Necessary in TAVI?

TAVI has seen a steady increase in use, though stroke continues to be one of its unwanted complications, mostly ischemic and, less frequently, hemorrhagic.

The use of cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices continues under debate, seeing as the several analyses conducted so far have failed to show conclusive or significant results as regards effectiveness. 

The BHF PROTECT-TAVI included 7,601 patients undergoing TAVI: 3,798 were treated with the SENTINEL device, while the rest formed the control group.

The primary endpoint was stroke within 72 hours after procedure or before hospital discharge.

Population mean age was 81, and 39% were women. Mean EUROSCORE was 2.4%. Regarding comorbidities: 68% had hypertension, 20% diabetes, 8% TIA, 6% previous stroke, 33% coronary artery disease, 13% heart failure, 33% atrial fibrillation, 33.5% peripheral vascular disease, 13% aortic arch abnormalities (including bovine arch), and 8% bicuspid aorta.

Read also: ACC 2025 | FAME 3: FFR Guided PCI vs CABG 5 Year Outcomes.

Ejection fraction was <30% in 5.5% of patients and 30% to 49% in 18%. Mean gradient was 43 mmHg. Nearly half of patients showed aortic annulus severe calcification, and 4% showed outflow tract calcification.

No significant differences were observed in primary end point, with 2.1% stroke incidence among CEP patients and 2.2% among control group patients (difference: –0.02 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.68 to 0.63; p=0.94). Also, there were no differences in severe stroke incidence (0.5% vs. 0.5%; difference: 0.0 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.3 to 0.3), and most strokes occurred within the first 24 hours after procedure.

Read also: ACC-2025 Congress Second Day Key Studies.

Likewise, no differences were observed in disabling stroke between weeks 6 and 8 after TAVI (1.2% vs. 1.4%; difference: –0.2 percentage points; 95% CI: –0.7 to 0.4), or mortality within 72 hours, during hospitalization, or at 8 weeks.

Conclusion

Among patients undergoing TAVI, the routine use of cerebral protection devices did not reduce stroke incidence within the first 72 hours.

Original Title: Routine Cerebral Embolic Protection during Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation.

Reference: Rajesh K. Kharbanda, et al. NEJM DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2415120.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Carlos Fava
Dr. Carlos Fava
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Percutaneous Tricuspid Valve Replacement with Lux-Valve

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a condition associated with poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations due to heart failure, and increased mortality, even under optimal...

TAVR in Small Annuli: What Valve Should We Use?

One of the major challenges of severe aortic stenosis are patients with small aortic annuli, defined as ≤430 mm² aortic valve area. This condition...

ACC 2025 | TAVI in Low-Risk Patients: 5-Year Outcomes of EVOLUTE LOW RISK

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in low-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. However, one of its main limitations...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Pretreatment with DAPT in Acute Coronary Syndrome: An Ongoing Debate?

In acute coronary syndrome (ACS) dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) has become a fundamental pillar after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), preventing stent thrombosis and acute...

Measuring Post-TAVI Gradients and Their Implications: Are Invasive and Echocardiographic Assessments Comparable?

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is considered the treatment of choice for a significant proportion of patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Outcomes have improved...

Another Blow for Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumo Counterpulsation? Randomized Study on Its Use in Chronic Heart Failure Progressing to Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a condition with extremely high mortality (around 50%). While most therapies for this pathology have been studied in CS secondary...