NAVULTRA Registry: One-Year Outcomes of Self-Expanding vs. Balloon-Expandable Valves

In recent years, technological advances and increased operator experience have significantly contributed to improve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) clinical and procedural outcomes.

At present, intra-annular self-expanding (SEV) and balloon expandable (BEV) valves are being used. New generations transcatheter heart valves (THV) have recently been developed: the SE Navitor (NAV) (Abbott) and the BE SAPIEN 3 Ultra (ULTRA) (Edwards Lifesciences). They have both shown promising results vs their prior versions. However, to date, these two prosthetic valves had not been compared directly.

The aim of this multicenter study was to compare NAV vs. ULTRA clinical and echocardiographic outcomes at 30 days and one year.  

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and a composite of all-cause death, stroke and readmission for cardiac failure (CF) at one year. 

The total study population included 3,878 patients; 1,746 were treated with NAV and 2,176 with ULTRA. Propensity score matched 1,363 pairs. Mean age was 81, and they were mostly women. Mean STS score was 4.01, and approximately half of patients were in NYHA functional class III or IV.

Read also: TAVR in Women.

After one year, all-cause mortality rate was 9.7 % for NAV and 9.9 % for ULTRA patients (p = 0.585). Likewise, there were no significant differences in the combined primary end point (13.6 % for NAV and 12,6 % for ULTRA; p = 0.218). However, new permanent pacemaker implantation rate was higher among NAV patients (20.6 % vs. 10.6 %; p < 0.01), as was readmission for CF (4.6 % vs. 2.8 %; p < 0.05). After one year, the use of NAV was associated with higher incidence of mild paravalvular leak (OR: 1.53; CI 95 %: 1.01–2.33; p < 0.05), though with lower mean transprosthetic gradients vs ULTRA (p < 0,01).

Conclusion

NAVULTRA has shown that, in patients undergoing TAVR with NAV and ULTRA, all-cause mortality rate and the combined end point of mortality, CR readmission or disabling stroke at one year, were comparable. However, there were differences in secondary end points and valve hemodynamic performance. These findings support the need for dedicated randomized studies directly comparing both intra-annular devices. 

Original Title: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Intra-Annular Self-Expanding or Balloon-Expandable Valves The Multicenter International NAVULTRA Registry.

Reference: Stefano Cannata, MD et al JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2025; 18:1557–1568.


Subscribe to our weekly newsletter

Get the latest scientific articles on interventional cardiology

Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Dr. Andrés Rodríguez
Member of the Editorial Board of solaci.org

More articles by this author

Embolization of Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices: Predictors, Prevention, and Management Strategies

Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk of stroke and, in patients with contraindications to anticoagulation, percutaneous left atrial appendage closure represents an...

Coronary revascularization before TAVI: prior PCI or conservative management?

The coexistence of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVI is common, with a reported prevalence ranging from 30%...

Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration versus Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Valve Endocarditis

Tricuspid valve infective endocarditis (TVIE) accounts for approximately 5% to 10% of all cases of infective endocarditis. Surgical treatment remains the standard therapy in...

CRT 2026 | TAVI-CLOSE Trial: Dual Suture vs Suture + Plug for Vascular Closure After Transfemoral TAVI

The transfemoral approach is the predominant strategy for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Although vascular complications are currently less frequent, they remain relevant determinants...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

ACVC 2026 | CELEBRATE Trial: Prehospital Zalunfiban Use in STEMI

Optimizing antithrombotic therapy in the prehospital phase of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains challenging due to the delayed onset of action of P2Y12...

ACVC 2026 | BOX Substudy: Mean Arterial Pressure Targets in Cardiogenic Shock After OHCA

Hemodynamic management of cardiogenic shock following ischemic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA-AMICS) remains an unresolved issue, particularly regarding optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) targets and...

ACVC 2026 | FLASH Registry European Cohort: Mechanical Thrombectomy in Pulmonary Embolism

The management of intermediate-high and high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE) remains an area of therapeutic uncertainty, particularly in patients with right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, in...