System Delays for STEMI patients linked to subsequent heart failure care

Reference: Terkelsen CJ, Jensen LO, Tilsted H-H, et al. Health care system delay and heart failure in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Follow-up of population-based medical registry data. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 361-7.

In patients with ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI), delays in obtaining primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are associated with an increased need for subsequent care, both inpatient and outpatient, related to chronic heart failure (CHF). According to a paper published in the September 20, 2011, issue of Annals of Internal Medicine, the findings add to a large body of evidence that system delays, which are modifiable, can make a tremendous difference in patient outcome.

On multivariable analysis, treatment delay as a whole independently predicted readmissions or outpatient visits for CHF treatment (adjusted HR 1.04 per hour increase; 95% CI 1.008-1.06; P = 0.012). However, separating treatment delay into its 2 components—patient delay and system delay—showed that only system delay was associated with CHF-related readmission or outpatient contact. According to the study authors, the findings make sense because delayed reperfusion is associated with more extensive myocardial necrosis and reduced LVEF. They say that health care system delay is the ideal performance measure in triaging patients with STEMI for primary PCI.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Morpheus Global Registry: Safety and efficacy of the long tapered BioMime™ Morph stent in complex coronary lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention in long coronary lesions continues to represent a technical and clinical challenge, in which the use of conventional cylindrical stents may...

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization versus Conventional Bypass Surgery in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

Significant left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease continues to represent a therapeutic challenge, particularly in patients with complex multivessel disease and high SYNTAX scores,...

Comparison of strategies: NMA of IVUS, OCT, or angiography in complex lesions

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in complex lesions continues to represent a technical challenge in contemporary interventional cardiology. Angiography, although it remains the most widely...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img

Recent Articles

Rolling Stone: Registry of Intravascular Lithotripsy vs Atherectomy Use in Complex Calcified Lesions

Severe coronary calcification represents one of the main challenges in performing percutaneous coronary intervention, both due to the higher risk of stent underexpansion and...

Can TAVI Be Safely Performed in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valve?

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents an anatomical challenge for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) due to the frequent presence of elliptical annuli, fibroc calcific...

FFR Assessment for the Selection of Hypertensive Patients Who Benefit from Renal Stenting

Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis (ARAS) represents one of the main causes of secondary hypertension (HTN) and is associated with a higher risk of renal...