System Delays for STEMI patients linked to subsequent heart failure care

Reference: Terkelsen CJ, Jensen LO, Tilsted H-H, et al. Health care system delay and heart failure in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Follow-up of population-based medical registry data. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 361-7.

In patients with ST-segment myocardial infarction (STEMI), delays in obtaining primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are associated with an increased need for subsequent care, both inpatient and outpatient, related to chronic heart failure (CHF). According to a paper published in the September 20, 2011, issue of Annals of Internal Medicine, the findings add to a large body of evidence that system delays, which are modifiable, can make a tremendous difference in patient outcome.

On multivariable analysis, treatment delay as a whole independently predicted readmissions or outpatient visits for CHF treatment (adjusted HR 1.04 per hour increase; 95% CI 1.008-1.06; P = 0.012). However, separating treatment delay into its 2 components—patient delay and system delay—showed that only system delay was associated with CHF-related readmission or outpatient contact. According to the study authors, the findings make sense because delayed reperfusion is associated with more extensive myocardial necrosis and reduced LVEF. They say that health care system delay is the ideal performance measure in triaging patients with STEMI for primary PCI.

SOLACI.ORG

More articles by this author

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...

Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in ACS Patients Receiving DOAC After PCI: More Bleeding Without Ischemic Benefit?

In patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who require direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) and undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), current guidelines recommend a dual...

EuroPCR 2026 | 10-Year Left Main PCI: When Survival Is Similar, Should the Less Invasive Strategy Prevail?

The primary goal of revascularization in left main coronary artery disease (LMCA) is to improve survival. However, debate continues regarding whether, in anatomically suitable...

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Related Articles

SOLACI Sessionsspot_img
Jornadas Guatemala 2026

Recent Articles

Plaque Ruptures in Non-Culprit Arteries: Follow-Up With Intravascular Imaging

Plaque rupture remains one of the most important pathophysiological mechanisms in acute coronary syndromes. However, not all ruptures manifest clinically as ischemia, myocardial infarction,...

Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: When Should They Be Used?

Peripheral drug-eluting stents have transformed the treatment of peripheral arterial disease by reducing restenosis rates and the need for repeat interventions. However, the emergence...

OCT-Detected High-Risk Plaques Predict Recurrent Events After Myocardial Infarction

After a myocardial infarction (MI), non-culprit lesions are often deferred when they are not flow-limiting (negative FFR). However, these lesions continue to represent an...